Cited by 72Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver physiology and pathologyHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies

Treatment response in the PIVENS trial is associated with decreased Hedgehog pathway activity

Open access
Guy, Cynthia D., Suzuki, Ayako, Abdelmalek, Manal F., Burchette, James L., Diehl, Anna Mae, for the NASH CRN·2015·Hepatology

Abstract

Hedgehog (Hh) ligand production by ballooned hepatocytes drives nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) progression in mice. The NIDDK‐sponsored PIVENS trial (NCT00063622) showed that vitamin E (VitE) improved NASH. We investigated whether VitE treatment and improvement in NASH were associated with changes in Hh pathway activity. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on both pre‐ and posttreatment liver biopsies of 59 PIVENS patients randomized to VitE (n = 30) or placebo (n = 29). Sonic Hh (Shh) ligand‐producing cells and Shh‐responsive cells were quantified. The latter was accomplished by triple IHC for gli2+ (marker of Hh signaling), sox‐9 (progenitor marker), and α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA; myofibroblast marker). Ballooned hepatocytes were quantified by keratin 8/18 and ubiquitin (K8/18/Ub) staining. IHC results were correlated with primary clinical and histologic PIVENS data. Pretreatment clinical, histologic, and IHC parameters did not differ significantly in the two treatment groups. Regardless of treatment arm, the number of Shh+ hepatocytes correlated with K8/18/Ub foci (r 2 = 0.47, P < 0.001) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (r 2 = 0.15, P = 0.002). Treatment‐related changes in the numbers of Shh+ hepatocytes correlated with changes in serum AST (partial r 2 = 0.75, P < 0.0001), hepatocyte ballooning ( P = 0.004), the ductular reaction (i.e., numbers of gli2+/sox9+ cells; P = 0.03 and α‐SMA+ cells; P = 0.10), and fibrosis stage ( P = 0.02). Treatment response was associated with a greater decrease in Shh+ hepatocytes than nonresponse ( P = 0.007). The VitE group demonstrated a greater reduction in K8/18/Ub+ foci ( P < 0.08) and Shh+ hepatocytes ( P < 0.05) than the placebo group, effects that became more significant after correction for baseline differences and multiple linear regression analysis. Conclusion : During PIVENS, treatment response correlated with loss of Shh+ hepatocytes and improvement in Hh‐regulated processes that promote NASH progression. (H epatology 2015;61:98–107)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.27235

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hedgehog ligands via their receptor Patched promote activation of HSCs in vitro and in mice, and show a positive correlation with progression from steatosis to steatohepatitis and myofibroblast activation in human livers.

    “In addition to regulating liver regeneration, hedgehog ligands, via their receptor Patched, promote the activation of HSCs in vitro and in mice, and show a positive correlation with progression from steatosis to steatohepatitis and myofibroblast activation in human livers.39,40”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guy, C. D., Suzuki, A., Abdelmalek, M. F., Burchette, J. L., Diehl, A. M., & CRN, F. T. N.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology,University of Arkansas,Little Rock,AR
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Diehl, Anna Mae
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2014-08-25
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
98-107
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W2163837559
Cited by
72
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (UO1DK061713, R01DK053792, RC2AA019399, R01DK077794)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Keywords
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, Hedgehog signaling, Sonic hedgehog, vitamin E, hepatocyte ballooning, treatment response, liver fibrosis, ductular reaction, myofibroblasts, liver biopsy histology, aspartate aminotransferase
MeSH terms
Adult, Alanine Transaminase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fibrosis, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Vitamin E, Vitamins, Treatment Outcome, Hepatocytes, Hedgehog Proteins, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review