Impaired place navigation in place and matching‐to‐place swimming pool tasks follows both retrosplenial cortex lesions and cingulum bundle lesions in rats
Abstract
The retrosplenial (RS) cortex (area 29) and the adjacent cingulum bundle (CG) are components of neural circuits that include the hippocampus. Given the evidence suggesting that the hippocampus plays a central role in spatial navigation, several lines of investigation have examined the possible contributions of these structures to spatial navigation. The combined and/or separate contributions of these structures have been difficult to establish because their close proximity usually results in combined injury after lesions and because there have been conflicting results related to lesion type and the strain of rat subjects. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of selective CG damage with selective RS damage in Long-Evans rats, a domestic rat strain that displays superior spatial skills, and by using spatial behavior assessment procedures that are sensitive to CG damage. Rats with cytotoxic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) RS lesions or surgical CG transection were tested on two spatial tasks in the Morris water task; a place learning task, sensitive to nonspatial and spatial behavior, and a matching-to-place task, sensitive to spatial behavior. Both the RS and CG groups were impaired on most measures relative to the control group on both the place task and the matching-to-place task. The results are discussed in relation to the anatomical organization of CG and RG projections to the hippocampus and with respect to their possible separate/conjoint contributions…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Separate retrosplenial and cingulum bundle lesions produce similar effects on water-maze tasks.
“This result also matches the finding of similar effects on water-maze tasks after separate retrosplenial and cingulum bundle lesions (Harker and Whishaw, 2004; see Table 1)”
From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Harker and Whishaw, 2004
Cites
A PROPOSED MECHANISM OF EMOTION
PAPEZ, J. W. (1937) · Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1937.02260220069003 · Cited by 3,563 · see citing works
Head direction, place, and movement correlates for cells in the rat retrosplenial cortex.
Cho, J., & Sharp, P. E. (2001) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.115.1.3 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Aggleton, J., Neave, N., Nagle, S., & Sahgal, A. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-11-07270.1995 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Troy Harker, K., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00083-9 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Are the Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus Functionally Distinct Structures?
Fanselow, M. S., & Dong, H.-W. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.031 · Cited by 3,358 · see citing works
What does the retrosplenial cortex do?
Vann, S. D., Aggleton, J. P., & Maguire, E. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2733 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction
Bubb, E. J., Metzler-Baddeley, C., & Aggleton, J. P. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.008 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
The septo-hippocampal system, learning and recovery of function
Niewiadomska, G., Baksalerska-Pazera, M., & Riedel, G. (2009) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.03.039 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Coulombe, M.-A., Lawrence, K. S., Moulin, D. E., Morley-Forster, P., Shokouhi, M., Nielson, W. R., & Davis, K. D. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2017.00047 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harker, K. T., & Whishaw, I. Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Lethbridge (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Harker, K. Troy
- ORCID
- Whishaw, Ian Q.
- Venue
- Hippocampus
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 224-231
- ISSN
- 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1063
- OpenAlex
- W1998337378
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- place navigation, retrosplenial cortex, cingulum, spatial learning, NMDA lesions, Long-Evans rats, spatial behavior, hippocampal projections
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Nerve Net, Orientation, Space Perception, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Maze Learning, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review