Cited by 468Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Methods and Impacts

Patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children during meals in fast food restaurants

Open access
Radesky, Jenny S., Kistin, Caroline J., Zuckerman, Barry, Nitzberg, Katie, Gross, Jamie, Kaplan-Sanoff, Margot, Augustyn, Marilyn, Silverstein, Michael·2014·Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mobile devices are a ubiquitous part of American life, yet how families use this technology has not been studied. We aimed to describe naturalistic patterns of mobile device use by caregivers and children to generate hypotheses about its effects on caregiver–child interaction. METHODS: Using nonparticipant observational methods, we observed 55 caregivers eating with 1 or more young children in fast food restaurants in a single metropolitan area. Observers wrote detailed field notes, continuously describing all aspects of mobile device use and child and caregiver behavior during the meal. Field notes were then subjected to qualitative analysis using grounded theory methods to identify common themes of device use. RESULTS: Forty caregivers used devices during their meal. The dominant theme salient to mobile device use and caregiver–child interaction was the degree of absorption in devices caregivers exhibited. Absorption was conceptualized as the extent to which primary engagement was with the device, rather than the child, and was determined by frequency, duration, and modality of device use; child response to caregiver use, which ranged from entertaining themselves to escalating bids for attention, and how caregivers managed this behavior; and separate versus shared use of devices. Highly absorbed caregivers often responded harshly to child misbehavior. CONCLUSIONS: We documented a range of patterns of mobile device use, characterized by varying degrees of absorption. These themes may be used as a foundation for coding schemes in quantitative studies exploring device use and child outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2013-3703

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fussier infants may be exposed to greater digital media for soothing.

    “and fussier infants may also be exposed to greater digital media for soothing.211”

    From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [211]

    In “Using Devices Separately Versus Coviewing” (page not available), the paper reports that caregivers sometimes gave toddlers devices apparently to control behavior when they became more active. This supports the possibility of using digital media to soothe or manage a child, but the paper does not establish that fussier infants receive greater exposure than less fussy infants. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]4. Worthen B. The perils of texting while par- enting. The Wall Street Journal. Sep 29, 2012
  2. [16]16. Wallis C. The Impacts of Media Multitasking on Children' s Learning and Development: Report From a Research Seminar. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop; 2010
  3. [26]26. Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3703 ; originally published online March 10, 2014;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C. J., Zuckerman, B., Nitzberg, K., Gross, J., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., Augustyn, M., & Silverstein, M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2014-04-01
Volume
133
Issue
4
Pages
e843-e849
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2116183712
Cited by
468
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6
FWCI
128.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
School of Medicine, Boston University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
Keywords
mobile device use, caregiver-child interaction, family meals, fast food restaurants, parental attention, child behavior problems, children's technology use
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Restaurants, Caregivers, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review