Cited by 255Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Parent distraction with phones, reasons for use, and impacts on parenting and child outcomes: A review of the emerging research

McDaniel, Brandon T.·2019·Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbe2.139

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDaniel, B. T.
Affiliations
Illinois State University (US)
Corresponding author
McDaniel, Brandon T.
Venue
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
72-80
ISSN
2578-1863 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2941047047
Cited by
255
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 4
FWCI
62.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
parental distraction, mobile phone use, parenting, child outcomes, parental attention, screen time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review