The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HR Professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: correspondence between research and practice
Abstract
Five thousand human resource (HR) professionals were surveyed regarding the extent to which they agreed with various HR research findings. Responses from 959 participants suggest that there are large discrepancies between research findings and practitioners' beliefs in some content areas, especially selection. In particular, practitioners place far less faith in intelligence and personality tests as predictors of employee performance than HR research would recommend. Practitioners are somewhat more likely to agree with research findings when they are at higher organizational levels, have SPHR certification, and read the academic literature. Suggestions are made for more effective dissemination of HR research findings. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.262 · Cited by 4,180
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · Cited by 2,126
A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t
Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.795 · Cited by 696
Cited by
An Ounce of Prevention Is Worth a Pound of Cure: Improving Research Quality Before Data Collection
Aguinis, H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091231 · Cited by 304
A critical review of algorithms in HRM: Definition, theory, and practice
Cheng, M. M., & Hackett, R. D. (2021) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100698 · Cited by 283
Becoming an evidence-based HR practitioner
Rousseau, D. M., & Barends, E. G. R. (2011) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2011.00173.x · Cited by 168
Toward a theory of evidence based decision making
Baba, V. V., & HakemZadeh, F. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211227546 · Cited by 167
Lay Perceptions of Selection Decision Aids in US and Non-US Samples
Diab, D. L., Pui, S.-Y., Yankelevich, M., & Highhouse, S. (2011) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00548.x · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A. E., & Brown, K. G.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-174
- ISSN
- 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-050X
- OpenAlex
- W2065553852
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HR Professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: correspondence between research and practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hrm.10029
- The paper
- Rynes, S. L., Colbert, A. E., & Brown, K. G. (2002). HR Professionals' beliefs about effective human resource practices: correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.10029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
