Cited by 259Organizational Change and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorOrganizational Management and Change

Organizational change cynicism: The role of employee involvement

Brown, Michelle, Cregan, Christina·2008·Human Resource Management

Abstract

Organizational change efforts can bring about a range of outcomes: some intended, such as organizational survival and profitability, and some unintended, such as heightened levels of organizational change cynicism (OCC) among employees. This article focuses on processes for managing OCC: we examine the role of information sharing and involvement in decision making as ways to lessen employee reports of OCC. While both of these strategies have the potential to be effective, they rest on a significant assumption—namely, that employees will enthusiastically embrace any opportunities to become involved. In this research, we investigate this assumption through an analysis of the relationship between an employee's willingness to become involved (”active orientation”) on employee reports of their OCC. We find, using data from 1,214 public‐sector employees, that an active orientation toward involvement plays a significant role as a moderator in reducing employee reports of OCC. The findings suggest that HR practitioners concerned about OCC should encourage their line managers to adopt a participatory style of management (information sharing, involvement in decision making), especially in those workplaces where employees are more likely to embrace the opportunities for involvement. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hrm.20239

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cynical dispositions, a negative attitude toward the status quo, marked by a fundamental mistrust of rulers' intentions and the conviction that fairness is sacrificed to further the interests of rulers, ultimately manifests itself in conformism to the neoliberal hegemony.

    “Cynical dispositions, a negative attitude toward the status quo, marked by a fundamental mistrust of rulers' intentions and the conviction that fairness is sacrificed to further the interests of rulers (cf. Brown and Cregan, 2008; Kim et al., 2009) ultimately manifests itself in conformism to the neoliberal hegemony.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, M., & Cregan, C.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Brown, Michelle
Venue
Human Resource Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-14
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
667-686
ISSN
  • 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-050X
OpenAlex
W2100025770
Cited by
259
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
Keywords
employee participation, information sharing, public sector employees, participatory management, moderating effect, employee attitudes toward change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review