Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microrna expression distinguishes between germinal center B cell‐like and activated B cell‐like subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Open access
Lawrie, Charles H., Soneji, Shamit, Marafioti, Teresa, Cooper, Christopher D.O., Palazzo, Stefano, Paterson, Jennifer C., Cattan, Helen, Enver, Tariq, Mager, Rachel, Boultwood, Jacqueline, Wainscoat, James S., Hatton, Christian S.R.·2007·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive malignancy that accounts for nearly 40% of all lymphoid tumors. This heterogeneous disease can be divided into germinal center B cell‐like (GCB) and activated B cell‐like (ABC) subtypes by gene expression and immunohistochemical profiling. Using microarray analysis on prototypic cell lines, we identified microRNAs (miR‐155, miR‐21 and miR‐221) that were more highly expressed in ABC‐type than GCB‐type cell lines. These microRNAs were over‐expressed in de novo DLBCL (n = 35), transformed DLBCL (n = 14) and follicular center lymphoma cases (n = 27) compared to normal B cells. Consistent with the cell line model, expression levels were higher in DLBCL cases with an ABC‐type immunophenotype than those that were GCB‐type (p < 0.05). Moreover, using multivariate analysis we found that expression of miR‐21 was an independent prognostic indicator in de novo DLBCL (p < 0.05). Interestingly, expression levels of both miR‐155 and miR‐21 were also higher in nonmalignant ABC than in GCB cells. As we also demonstrate that expression of microRNAs can be measured reliably from routine paraffin‐embedded biopsies of more than 8‐years‐old (p < 0.001), we suggest that microRNAs could be clinically useful molecular markers for DLBCL as well as other cancers. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.22800

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Authors
Lawrie, C. H., Soneji, S., Marafioti, T., Cooper, C. D. O., Palazzo, S., Paterson, J. C., Cattan, H., Enver, T., Mager, R., Boultwood, J., Wainscoat, J. S., & Hatton, C. S. R.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-08
Volume
121
Issue
5
Pages
1156-1161
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1967705046
Cited by
409
References
3
FWCI
21.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.