Cited by 125Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Identification of candidate prostate cancer biomarkers in prostate needle biopsy specimens using proteomic analysis

Open access
Lin, Jian‐feng, Xu, Jun, Tian, Hong‐yu, Gao, Xia, Chen, Qing‐xi, Gu, Qi, Xu, Gen‐jun, Song, Jian‐da +1 more·2007·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Although serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a well-established diagnostic tool for prostate cancer (PCa) detection, the definitive diagnosis of PCa is based on the information contained in prostate needle biopsy (PNBX) specimens. To define the proteomic features of PNBX specimens to identify candidate biomarkers for PCa, PNBX specimens from patients with PCa or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were subjected to comparative proteomic analysis. 2-DE revealed that 52 protein spots exhibited statistically significantly changes among PCa and BPH groups. Interesting spots were identified by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS. The 2 most notable groups of proteins identified included latent androgen receptor coregulators [FLNA(7-15) and FKBP4] and enzymes involved in mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation (DCI and ECHS1). An imbalance in the expression of peroxiredoxin subtypes was noted in PCa specimens. Furthermore, different post-translationally modified isoforms of HSP27 and HSP70.1 were identified. Importantly, changes in FLNA(7-15), FKBP4, and PRDX4 expression were confirmed by immunoblot analyses. Our results suggest that a proteomics-based approach is useful for developing a more complete picture of the protein profile of PNBX specimen. The proteins identified by this approach may be useful molecular targets for PCa diagnostics and therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.23016

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, Thun M. Can- cer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:106-30.
  2. Yang L, Li L, Chen Y, Parkin DM. Cancer incidence and mortality estimates and prediction for year 2000 and 2005 in China. Chinese J Health Stat 2005;22:218-32.
  3. Ornstein DK, Gillespie JW, Paweletz CP, Duray PH, Herring J, Vocke CD, Topalian SL, Bostwick DG, Linehan WM, Petricoin EF III, Emmert-Buck MR. Proteomic analysis of laser capture microdissected human prostate cancer and in vitro prostate cell. Electrophoresis 2000;21:2235-42.
  4. Davies TH, Sanchez ER. FKBP52. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005; 37:42-4.
  5. Karihtala P, Mantyniemi A, Kang SW, Kinnula VL, Soini Y. Peroxir- edoxins in breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:3418-24.
  6. Sarto C, Binz PA, Mocarelli P. Heat shock proteins in human cancer. Electrophoresis 2000;21:1218-26.
  7. Gibbons NB, Watson RW, Coffey RN, Brady HP, Fitzpatrick JM. Heat-shock proteins inhibit induction of prostate cancer cell apopto- sis. Prostate 2000;45:58-65.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, J., Xu, J., Tian, H., Gao, X., Chen, Q., Gu, Q., Xu, G., Song, J., & Zhao, F.
Affiliations
  • Huadong Hospital (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Gu, Qi
  • Zhao, Fu‐kun
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-23
Volume
121
Issue
12
Pages
2596-2605
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W2087839294
Cited by
125
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
prostate cancer, prostate needle biopsy, tumor markers, benign prostatic hyperplasia, proteomic profiling, FKBP4, mitochondrial beta-oxidation, DCI, ECHS1, peroxiredoxin, HSP27, HSP70, post-translational modification, peroxiredoxin 4
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Needle, Contractile Proteins, Feasibility Studies, Heat-Shock Proteins, Humans, Male, Microfilament Proteins, Neoplasm Proteins, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Prostatic Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Immunoblotting, Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Molecular Chaperones, HSP70 Heat-Shock Proteins, Tacrolimus Binding Proteins, Proteomics, Peroxiredoxins, HSP27 Heat-Shock Proteins, Filamins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review