Cited by 109

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simvastatin, 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, suppresses osteoclastogenesis induced by receptor activator of nuclear factor‐κB ligand through modulation of NF‐κB pathway

Ahn, Kwang Seok, Sethi, Gautam, Chaturvedi, Madan M., Aggarwal, Bharat B.·2008·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Simvastatin, an inhibitor of 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, is a cholesterol‐lowering drug that may play a role in bone metabolism through a mechanism that is not fully understood. Recently, receptor activator of NF‐κB ligand (RANKL), a member of the TNF superfamily, has emerged as a major mediator of bone loss via activation of osteoclastogenesis. The latter is also associated with certain cancers such as multiple myeloma and breast cancer. Whether simvastatin can modulate RANKL‐induced or cancer induced osteoclastogenesis was investigated. The effect of simvastatin on RANKL signaling and consequent osteoclastogenesis was investigated. RANKL induced NF‐κB activation, whereas pretreatment with simvastatin completely suppressed such activation and correlated with suppression of RANKL‐induced activation of IκBα kinase, IκBα phosphorylation and IκBα degradation. Similarly, RANKL induced the differentiation of monocytic cells to osteoclasts, whereas simvastatin suppressed it. The inhibition was maximal when cells were exposed to both simvastatin and RANKL simultaneously and minimal when simvastatin was added 1 day after RANKL treatment. Simvastatin also inhibited the osteoclastogenesis induced by human breast cancer and by multiple myeloma cells. Together, our results indicate that simvastatin inhibits the RANKL‐induced NF‐κB activation pathway that leads to suppression of osteoclastogenesis induced by RANKL and by tumor cells, thereby suggesting its therapeutic potential in osteoporosis and in cancer‐related bone loss. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.23745

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effects exerted by RhoA on NF-kB and NO synthesis are highly variable and depend on cell type.

    “The effects exerted by RhoA on NF-kB and NO synthesis are highly variable and depend on cell type (Nakata et al., 2007;Ahn et al., 2008;32: Ye et al., 2008).”

    From The association of statins plus LDL receptor‐targeted liposome‐encapsulated doxorubicin increases in vitro drug delivery across blood–brain barrier cells (2012) · cites this paper as Ahn et al., 2008

    The Discussion passage describes RANKL-induced NF-κB signaling in osteoclastogenesis, and the IKK assay passage examines simvastatin’s effect in RAW 264.7 cells; neither addresses whether RhoA’s effects vary by cell type. Searches for RhoA and nitric oxide synthesis found no passage addressing the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1093/rheumatology/keh395 · DOI
  2. 10.1074/jbc.271.21.12511 · DOI
  3. 10.1056/NEJM199502023320506 · DOI
  4. 10.1210/endo.139.6.6087 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.2.270 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81569-X · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1080/03008200390181753 · DOI
  9. 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3597 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/16852 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Athanasou NA, 1999, Human osteoclast ontogeny and pathological bone resorption, Histol Histopathol, 14, 635
  12. Bhatia P, 2005, Expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor‐κB is inversely correlated with metastatic phenotype in breast carcinoma, Clin Cancer Res, 11, 162, 10.1158/1078-0432.162.11.1 · DOI
  13. 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0474 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.coph.2004.03.011 · DOI
  15. Farrugia AN, 2003, Receptor activator of nuclear factor‐kappaB ligand expression by human myeloma cells mediates osteoclast formation in vitro and correlates with bone destruction in vivo, Cancer Res, 63, 5438
  16. 10.1002/ijc.20308 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/jcb.10662 · DOI
  18. 10.1096/fj.04-1823fje · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)10132-0 · DOI
  20. Zhang J, 2003, Soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor κB Fc diminishes prostate cancer progression in bone, Cancer Res, 63, 7883
  21. 10.1126/science.286.5446.1946 · DOI
  22. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4232 · DOI
  23. Grasser WA, 2003, Regulation of osteoclast differentiation by statins, J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 3, 53
  24. 10.1210/endo.142.3.8031 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0076-6879(00)19055-X · DOI
  26. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.2507 · DOI
  27. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0076 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.M411189200 · DOI
  29. 10.1074/jbc.M213067200 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/41493 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1856 · DOI
  32. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1002/ijc.21008 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/jcb.20598 · DOI
  35. 10.1055/s-2005-870538 · DOI
  36. 10.1074/jbc.C400258200 · DOI
  37. 10.1074/jbc.273.32.20551 · DOI
  38. 10.1074/jbc.273.51.34120 · DOI
  39. 10.1074/jbc.M008198200 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nm1203 · DOI
  41. 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.612 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00105-2 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/gad.11.24.3482 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/nm1197-1285 · DOI
  45. 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.7.1200 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.4049/jimmunol.163.1.434 · DOI
  47. 10.1084/jem.186.12.2075 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1002/jcb.10746 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.012 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nrc867 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S1043-2760(00)00351-9 · DOI
  52. 10.1182/blood-2003-06-2151 · DOI
  53. 10.1073/pnas.0403621101 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahn, K. S., Sethi, G., Chaturvedi, M. M., & Aggarwal, B. B.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-13
Volume
123
Issue
8
Pages
1733-1740
ISSN
  • 0020-7136
  • 1097-0215
Cited by
109
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review