Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Establishment of tumor‐specific copy number alterations from plasma DNA of patients with cancer

Open access
Heitzer, Ellen, Auer, Martina, Hoffmann, Eva Maria, Pichler, Martin, Gasch, Christin, Ulz, Peter, Lax, Sigurd, Waldispuehl‐Geigl, Julie, Mauermann, Oliver, Mohan, Sumitra, Pristauz, Gunda, Lackner, Carolin, Höfler, Gerald, Eisner, Florian, Petru, Edgar, Sill, Heinz, Samonigg, Hellmut, Pantel, Klaus, Riethdorf, Sabine, Bauernhofer, Thomas, Geigl, Jochen B., Speicher, Michael R.·2013·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

With the increasing number of available predictive biomarkers, clinical management of cancer is becoming increasingly reliant on the accurate serial monitoring of tumor genotypes. We tested whether tumor‐specific copy number changes can be inferred from the peripheral blood of patients with cancer. To this end, we determined the plasma DNA size distribution and the fraction of mutated plasma DNA fragments with deep sequencing and an ultrasensitive mutation‐detection method, i.e., the Beads, Emulsion, Amplification, and Magnetics (BEAMing) assay. When analyzing the plasma DNA of 32 patients with Stage IV colorectal carcinoma, we found that a subset of the patients (34.4%) had a biphasic size distribution of plasma DNA fragments that was associated with increased circulating tumor cell numbers and elevated concentration of mutated plasma DNA fragments. In these cases, we were able to establish genome‐wide tumor‐specific copy number alterations directly from plasma DNA. Thus, we could analyze the current copy number status of the tumor genome, which was in some cases many years after diagnosis of the primary tumor. An unexpected finding was that not all patients with progressive metastatic disease appear to release tumor DNA into the circulation in measurable quantities. When we analyzed plasma DNA from 35 patients with metastatic breast cancer, we made similar observations suggesting that our approach may be applicable to a variety of tumor entities. This is the first description of such a biphasic distribution in a surprisingly high proportion of cancer patients which may have important implications for tumor diagnosis and monitoring.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.28030

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Heitzer, E., Auer, M., Hoffmann, E. M., Pichler, M., Gasch, C., Ulz, P., Lax, S., Waldispuehl‐Geigl, J., Mauermann, O., Mohan, S., Pristauz, G., Lackner, C., Höfler, G., Eisner, F., Petru, E., Sill, H., Samonigg, H., Pantel, K., Riethdorf, S., Bauernhofer, T., Geigl, J. B., & Speicher, M. R.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-13
Volume
133
Issue
2
Pages
346-356
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1608841013
Cited by
175
References
5
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Establishment of tumor‐specific copy number alterations from plasma DNA of patients with cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.28030
The paper
Heitzer, E., Auer, M., Hoffmann, E. M., Pichler, M., Gasch, C., Ulz, P., Lax, S., Waldispuehl‐Geigl, J., Mauermann, O., Mohan, S., Pristauz, G., Lackner, C., Höfler, G., Eisner, F., Petru, E., Sill, H., Samonigg, H., Pantel, K., Riethdorf, S., . . . Speicher, M. R. (2013). Establishment of tumor‐specific copy number alterations from plasma DNA of patients with cancer. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.