Cited by 85Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Modelling the benefits of early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer using a biomarker signature

Open access
Ghatnekar, Ola, Andersson, Roland, Svensson, Marianne, Persson, Ulf, Ringdahl, Ulrika, Zeilon, Paula, Borrebaeck, Carl A.K.·2013·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival of 3-4%. This is mainly due to late diagnosis because of diffuse symptoms, where 80-85% of the patients are inoperable. Consequently, early diagnosis would be of significant benefit, resulting in a potential 5-year survival of 30-40%. However, new technologies must be carefully evaluated concerning effectiveness and healthcare costs. We have developed a framework for modelling cost and health effects from early detection of PC, which for the first time allowed us to analyse its cost-effectiveness. A probabilistic cohort model for estimating costs and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) arising from screening for PC, compared to a "wait-and-see"-approach, was designed. The test accuracy, Swedish survival and costs by tumour stage, expected life gain from early detection and pretest probabilities in risk groups, were retrieved from previous investigations. In a cohort of newly diagnosed diabetic patient (incidence 0.71%) the incremental cost per QALY gained (ICER) was €13,500, which is considered cost-effective in Europe. Results were mainly sensitive to the incidence with the ICER ranging from €315 to €204,000 (familial PC 35% and general population 0.046%, respectively). This is the first study focusing on clinical implementation of advanced testing and what is required for novel technologies in cancer care to be cost-effective. The model clearly demonstrated the potential of multiplexed proteomic-testing of PC and also identified the requirements for test accuracy. Consequently, it can serve as a model for assessing the possibilities to introduce advanced test platforms also for other cancer indications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.28256

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ghatnekar and colleagues developed a framework for modelling cost and quality-adjusted life-years of serum biomarker-mediated early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in individuals with new-onset diabetes.

    “Ghatnekar and colleagues74 developed a framework for modelling cost and quality-adjusted life-years of serum biomarker-mediated early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in individuals with new-onset diabetes.”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [74]

  • That study, done within the Swedish health-care system, concluded that biomarker-mediated screening is highly desirable.

    “This study, which was done within the Swedish health-care system, concluded that biomarker-mediated screening is highly desirable.”

    From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [74]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Claxton K. Oft, Vbp: Qed? Health Econ 2007;16:545-58.
  2. Tingstedt B, Weitk€ amper C, Andersson R. Early Onset Pancreatic Cancer-comparison against matched controls. Annals of Gastroenterology 2011;24:206-12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghatnekar, O., Andersson, R., Svensson, M., Persson, U., Ringdahl, U., Zeilon, P., & Borrebaeck, C. A. K.
Affiliations
  • Swedish Institute for Health Economics (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Svensson, Marianne
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-10
Volume
133
Issue
10
Pages
2392-2397
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1765673603
Cited by
85
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lunds Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, early diagnosis, cancer screening, cost-effectiveness, biomarker signatures, quality-adjusted life years, diabetic patients, tumor stage, diagnostic accuracy, watch-and-wait strategy
MeSH terms
Aged, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Health Care Costs, Models, Economic, Proteomics, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review