Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subpopulations of myeloid‐derived suppressor cells impair T cell responses through independent nitric oxide‐related pathways

Open access
Raber, Patrick L., Thevenot, Paul, Sierra, Rosa, Wyczechowska, Dorota, Halle, Daniel, Ramirez, Maria E., Ochoa, Augusto C., Fletcher, Matthew, Velasco, Cruz, Wilk, Anna, Reiss, Krzysztof, Rodriguez, Paulo C.·2014·International Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The accumulation of myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in tumor‐bearing hosts is a hallmark of malignancy‐associated inflammation and a major mediator for the induction of T cell suppression in cancer. MDSC can be divided phenotypically into granulocytic (G‐MDSC) and monocytic (Mo‐MDSC) subgroups. Several mechanisms mediate the induction of T cell anergy by MDSC; however, the specific role of these pathways in the inhibitory activity of MDSC subpopulations remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to determine the effector mechanisms by which subsets of tumor‐infiltrating MDSC block T cell function. We found that G‐MDSC had a higher ability to impair proliferation and expression of effector molecules in activated T cells, as compared to Mo‐MDSC. Interestingly, both MDSC subgroups inhibited T cells through nitric oxide (NO)‐related pathways, but expressed different effector inhibitory mechanisms. Specifically, G‐MDSC impaired T cells through the production of peroxynitrites (PNT), while Mo‐MDSC suppressed by the release of NO. The production of PNT in G‐MDSC depended on the expression of gp91 phox and endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), while inducible NO synthase (iNOS) mediated the generation of NO in Mo‐MDSC. Deletion of eNOS and gp91 phox or scavenging of PNT blocked the suppressive function of G‐MDSC and induced anti‐tumoral effects, without altering Mo‐MDSC inhibitory activity. Furthermore, NO‐scavenging or iNOS knockdown prevented Mo‐MDSC function, but did not affect PNT production or suppression by G‐MDSC. These results suggest that MDSC subpopulations utilize independent effector mechanisms to regulate T cell function. Inhibition of these pathways is expected to specifically block MDSC subsets and overcome immune suppression in cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijc.28622

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Raber, P. L., Thevenot, P., Sierra, R., Wyczechowska, D., Halle, D., Ramirez, M. E., Ochoa, A. C., Fletcher, M., Velasco, C., Wilk, A., Reiss, K., & Rodriguez, P. C.
Venue
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-03
Volume
134
Issue
12
Pages
2853-2864
ISSN
  • 0020-7136 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0215
OpenAlex
W1552212814
Cited by
297
References
45
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Subpopulations of myeloid‐derived suppressor cells impair T cell responses through independent nitric oxide‐related pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijc.28622
The paper
Raber, P. L., Thevenot, P., Sierra, R., Wyczechowska, D., Halle, D., Ramirez, M. E., Ochoa, A. C., Fletcher, M., Velasco, C., Wilk, A., Reiss, K., & Rodriguez, P. C. (2014). Subpopulations of myeloid‐derived suppressor cells impair T cell responses through independent nitric oxide‐related pathways. International Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28622

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.