Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic scoping review of COVID‐19 during pregnancy and childbirth

Open access
Elshafeey, Farida, Magdi, Rana, Hindi, Nader, Elshebiny, Mohamed, Farrag, Nourhan, Mahdy, Shahd, Sabbour, Mohamed, Gebril, Sara, Nasser, Mohamed, Kamel, Menna, Amir, Abdelrahman, Maher Emara, Moataz, Nabhan, Ashraf·2020·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Background: Clinical presentation and outcomes of COVID‐19 infection during pregnancy remain limited and fragmented. Objectives: To summarize the existing literature on COVID‐19 infection during pregnancy and childbirth, particularly concerning clinical presentation and outcomes. Search strategy: A systematic search of LitCovid, EBSCO MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases. The references of relevant studies were also searched. Selection criteria: Identified titles and abstracts were screened to select original reports and cross‐checked for overlap of cases. Data collection and analysis: A descriptive summary organized by aspects of clinical presentations (symptoms, imaging, and laboratory) and outcomes (maternal and perinatal). Main results: We identified 33 studies reporting 385 pregnant women with COVID‐19 infection: 368 (95.6%) mild; 14 (3.6%) severe; and 3 (0.8%) critical. Seventeen women were admitted to intensive care, including six who were mechanically ventilated and one maternal mortality. A total of 252 women gave birth, comprising 175 (69.4%) cesarean and 77 (30.6%) vaginal births. Outcomes for 256 newborns included four RT‐PCR positive neonates, two stillbirths, and one neonatal death. Conclusion: COVID‐19 infection during pregnancy probably has a clinical presentation and severity resembling that in non‐pregnant adults. It is probably not associated with poor maternal or perinatal outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijgo.13182

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Elshafeey, F., Magdi, R., Hindi, N., Elshebiny, M., Farrag, N., Mahdy, S., Sabbour, M., Gebril, S., Nasser, M., Kamel, M., Amir, A., Maher Emara, M., & Nabhan, A.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-17
Volume
150
Issue
1
Pages
47-52
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W3020068194
Cited by
408
References
29
FWCI
49.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic scoping review of COVID‐19 during pregnancy and childbirth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ijgo.13182
The paper
Elshafeey, F., Magdi, R., Hindi, N., Elshebiny, M., Farrag, N., Mahdy, S., Sabbour, M., Gebril, S., Nasser, M., Kamel, M., Amir, A., Maher Emara, M., & Nabhan, A. (2020). A systematic scoping review of COVID‐19 during pregnancy and childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13182

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.