Cited by 10Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningCultural Differences and Values

Does the mortality salience effect on worldview defence depend on the cultural orientation of Chinese people?

Zeng, Taoran, Tse, Chi‐Shing·2020·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

According to the terror management theory, people tend to favour their worldview and in-group members after being reminded of death (i.e., mortality salience [MS] effect). However, inconsistent findings of the MS effect were found among Chinese people. In the present study, we examined the MS effect with Chinese samples and tested whether the effect would depend on participants' cultural orientation and relational self-esteem. In Studies 1 (N = 227) and 2 (N = 221), we examined the roles of participants' cultural orientations and relational self-esteem in their evaluations on moral transgression and/or perceived regard from people around after being primed with mortality (vs. dental pain) salience. We obtained the interaction effects of mortality salience, cultural orientations, and relational self-esteem. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of Chinese culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ijop.12562

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These authors suggested that East Asian individuals may be more tolerant and/or fear death less than Westerners, both of which mitigate the terror that underlies MS inductions, potentially due to reduced individualism within these cultures.

    “These authors suggested that East Asian individuals may be more tolerant and/or fear death less than Westerners, both of which mitigate the “terror” that underlies MS inductions, potentially due to reduced individualism within these cultures.”
  • Several groups who recruited primarily East Asian samples were unable to find significant effects or identified very small effects.

    “Several groups who recruited primarily East Asian samples were unable to find significant effects or identified very small effects [e.g., 31–34].”
  • Cultural orientation and relational (vs. personal) self-esteem have emerged as important moderators of MS effects.

    “However, cultural orientation and relational (vs. personal) self-esteem have emerged as important moderators of MS effects [34], suggesting that “Western” vs. “non-Western” may not be sufficient to understand cultural influences in TMT; and classifying studies that way may be problematic and essentialist.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, T., & Tse, C.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Zeng, Taoran
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-28
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
291-304
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
OpenAlex
W2908351031
Cited by
10
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
mortality salience, terror management theory, cultural orientation, Chinese culture, moral transgression, fear of death
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Death, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Asian People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review