Cited by 69Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningCultural Differences and Values

Enjoying life in the face of death: East-West differences in responses to mortality salience

Ma-Kellams, Christine, Blascovich, Jim·2012·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Five experiments explored the hypothesis that thinking about one's own death activates thoughts about enjoying one's life as moderated by culture. Given that Eastern cultures, relative to Western ones, are more holistic and endorse notions of "yin and yang" (e.g., where "good" and "bad" coexist in all things), we hypothesized that East Asians would be more likely than European Americans to think about life and strive more to enjoy life when mortality salience (MS) is evoked. As predicted, MS led East Asians, but not European Americans, to (a) activate more life-related thoughts (Study 1); (b) express greater interest in enjoyable daily life activities (Study 2); and (c) report enjoying daily life activities more (Study 3). Cultural differences in holism mediated the tendency to enjoy life in the face of death (Study 4), and experimental induction of holism caused greater life enjoyment in response to MS (Study 5). Implications for terror management theory and culture are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029366

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma-Kellams, C., & Blascovich, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
773-786
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1994767333
Cited by
69
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
mortality salience, death awareness, enjoyment of life, East-West comparison, East Asian culture, holism, yin and yang, terror management theory, European Americans, activities of daily living, cross-cultural psychology
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Asian, Attitude to Death, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Asia, Eastern, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review