Cited by 48Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Prenatal reflective functioning in primiparous women with a high-risk profile.

Smaling, Hanneke J.A., Huijbregts, Stephan C.J., Suurland, Jill, Van Der Heijden, Kristiaan B., Van Goozen, Stephanie H.M., Swaab, Hanna·2015·Infant Mental Health Journal

Abstract

The concept of maternal reflective functioning (RF) has been gaining increasing interest as a possible intermediate mechanism in associations between a wide range of psychosocial risk factors and poor child outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to determine which psychosocial risk factors are linked to prenatal RF in a high-risk (HR) group of primiparous women. Differences in prenatal RF between the HR group and a low-risk (LR) control group also were examined. The sample consisted of 162 women (M = 22.22 years, SD = 2.39; 83 classified as HR). RF was coded from the Pregnancy Interview (A. Slade, 2007a). Risk status was assessed by means of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-plus (M.I.N.I.-plus; D.V. Sheehan et al., 1997) and several questionnaires. HR women demonstrated significantly lower RF quality than did the LR group. Regression analyses indicated that maternal education, size of social support network, and substance use during pregnancy were the strongest predictors of prenatal RF for the HR group. The results suggest that maternal RF potentially could be an important target for those prevention and intervention programs that aim to reduce adverse psychosocial development in offspring of HR mothers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/imhj.21506

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smaling, H. J. A., Huijbregts, S. C. J., Suurland, J., Van Der Heijden, K. B., Van Goozen, S. H. M., & Swaab, H.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Leiden University
  • Leiden University and Cardiff University
Corresponding author
Smaling, Hanneke J.A.
Venue
Infant Mental Health Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-13
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
251-261
ISSN
  • 0163-9641 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0355
OpenAlex
W1935714034
Cited by
48
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infant Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
maternal reflective functioning, primiparous women, high-risk pregnancy, psychosocial risk factors, maternal education, social support networks, substance use during pregnancy, prevention programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Social Support, Pregnancy, High-Risk, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review