Cited by 553Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Maternal reflective functioning, mother–infant affective communication, and infant attachment: Exploring the link between mental states and observed caregiving behavior in the intergenerational transmission of attachment

Kelly, Kristen, Slade, Arietta, Grienenberger, John F.·2005·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

This study examines the link between mental representations and maternal behavior within the intergenerational transmission of attachment. Maternal reflective functioning was hypothesized to predict the quality of mother-infant affective communication based on the AMBIANCE measure. Each of these measures was also considered as a predictor of the quality of infant attachment. The subjects were 45 mothers and their 10-14-month-old infants. Results supported each of the study's major hypotheses. The AMBIANCE measure and the reflective functioning measure had a strong negative correlation. Thus, the level of disruption in mother-infant affective communication was inversely related to the level of maternal reflective functioning. The AMBIANCE measure was also shown to be a very good predictor of infant attachment. Mothers with high AMBIANCE scores were more likely to have infants classified as disorganized or resistant, whereas mothers with low AMBIANCE scores were more likely to have infants classified as secure. A linear regression analysis indicated that maternal behavior mediates the impact of maternal reflective functioning upon infant attachment. Implications for attachment theory and early intervention are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616730500245963

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, K., Slade, A., & Grienenberger, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • Wright Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Grienenberger, John F.
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2005-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
299-311
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W2128383933
Cited by
553
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 23
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
maternal reflective functioning, infant attachment, intergenerational transmission of attachment, caregiver behavior, disorganized attachment, resistant attachment, secure attachment, mental representation
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Female, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Mental Processes, Mother-Child Relations, Nonverbal Communication, Object Attachment, Psychological Tests, Psychological Theory, Linear Models, Child of Impaired Parents, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review