Cited by 43Psychometric Methodologies and TestingFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Assessing Parentification in South American College Students: A Factor Analytic Study of a Spanish Version of the Parentification Inventory

Hooper, Lisa M.·2014·Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development

Abstract

The Parentification Inventory (PI; Hooper, ) was developed to retrospectively assess various levels of parentification (whereby children take on caregiving and parental roles, responsibilities, and relationships reserved for adults). This study examined the underlying factor structure of the first Spanish version of the PI with a sample of 231 South American Latina/o college students. The results showed sound internal consistency and supported an 18‐item, 3‐component solution. Implications for culturally tailored research and practice are discussed. El Inventario de Parentificación (PI, por sus siglas en inglés; Hooper, ) fue desarrollado para evaluar retrospectivamente varios niveles de parentificación (el proceso mediante el cual los niños adoptan roles, responsabilidades y relaciones paternales y de cuidadores, normalmente reservadas para adultos). Este estudio examinó la estructura de factores subyacentes de la primera versión en español del PI con una muestra de 231 estudiantes universitarios sudamericanos/latinos de ambos sexos. Los resultados mostraron una firme consistencia interna y afirmaron una solución de 18 elementos en 3 componentes. Se discuten las implicaciones para investigaciones y prácticas culturalmente adaptadas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2161-1912.2014.00047.x

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The parentification inventory has been translated into many languages and has demonstrated reliability and validity in studies across continents-North America, Australia, South America, Africa, Europe, and Asia.

    “The fact that the parentification inventory has been translated into many languages and has demonstrated reliability and validity in studies across continents—North America, Australia, South America [165], Africa [166], Europe [167], and Asia [55]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hooper, L. M.
Affiliations
University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Hooper, Lisa M.
Venue
Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
93-106
ISSN
  • 0883-8534 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-1912
OpenAlex
W2121264630
Cited by
42
References
63
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
parentification, Spanish translation, factor structure, child caregiving, cultural adaptation, psychometric validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review