Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation

Open access
DALY, SHANNA R., YILMAZ, SEDA, CHRISTIAN, JAMES L., SEIFERT, COLLEEN M., GONZALEZ, RICHARD·2012·Journal of Engineering Education

Abstract

Innovation in design depends on successful concept generation.The ideation stage of design is intended to produce multiple, varied concepts from which to develop and choose.Often, instruction on idea generation methods is not offered in engineering classes; however, when taught, it is commonly through techniques like brainstorming, which lacks specific ways to generate designs.Further, existing ideation strategies are not based on evidence from designers or rigorous testing through empirical studies. PURPOSEThis study investigated how engineering students and practitioners generated ideas.We focused on how designers used product characteristics to define concepts, and how previous concepts were transformed into new solutions by modifying their characteristics.Our methodology is based on our previous work identifying Design Heuristics in engineering solutions, defined as cognitive prompts that facilitate exploration of multiple designs during concept generation. METHODThink-aloud recordings and concept sketches were collected from 36 engineering students and practitioners (with varying levels of experience) as they generated ideas for a novel design task in a laboratory setting.These data, along with retrospective interviews, were analyzed for the ideation strategies evident in the participants' solutions. RESULTSThis study revealed evidence for over 60 strategies for concept generation during the ideation stage.Participants generated novel concepts and proposed concept modifications, and specific Design Heuristics were observed in their designs.The results suggest instruction on Design Heuristics can aid in effective idea generation. CONCLUSIONSThis protocol study of engineering designers provides a collection of heuristics observed in practice that offers new methods for students and practitioners to explore design spaces.The Design Heuristics identified in this and previous work can potentially be learned and then incorporated into the practice of engineering students and practitioners.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01121.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
DALY, S. R., YILMAZ, S., CHRISTIAN, J. L., SEIFERT, C. M., & GONZALEZ, R.
Venue
Journal of Engineering Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
601-629
ISSN
  • 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-9830
OpenAlex
W2003168226
Cited by
243
References
6
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01121.x
The paper
DALY, S. R., YILMAZ, S., CHRISTIAN, J. L., SEIFERT, C. M., & GONZALEZ, R. (2012). Design Heuristics in Engineering Concept Generation. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01121.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.