The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast‐like cells (MG63)
Abstract
The effect of surface roughness on osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis was examined. Human osteoblast‐like cells (MG63) were cultured on titanium (Ti) disks that had been prepared by one of five different treatment regimens. All disks were pretreated with hydrofluoric acid‐nitric acid and washed (PT). PT disks were also: washed, and then electropolished (EP); fine sandblasted, etched with HCl and H 2 SO 4, and washed (FA); coarse sandblasted, etched with HCl and H 2 SO 4, and washed (CA); or Ti plasma‐sprayed (TPS). Standard tissue culture plastic was used as a control. Surface topography and profile were evaluated by brightfield and darkfield microscopy, cold field emission scanning electron microscopy, and laser confocal microscopy, while chemical composition was mapped using energy dispersion X‐ray analysis and elemental distribution determined using Auger electron spectroscopy. The effect of surface roughness on the cells was evaluated by measuring cell number, [3 H]thymidine incorporation into DNA, alkaline phosphatase specific activity, [3 H]uridine incorporation into RNA, [3 H]proline incorporation into collagenase digestible protein (CDP) and noncollagenase‐digestible protein (NCP), and [35 S]sulfate incorporation into proteoglycan. Based on surface analysis, the five different Ti surfaces were ranked in order of smoothest to roughest: EP, PT, FA, CA, and TPS. A TiO 2 layer was found on all surfaces that ranged in thickness from 100 Å in the smoothest group to 300 Å in the roughest. When compared to confluent cultures of cells on plastic, the number of cells was reduced on the TPS surfaces and increased on the EP surfaces, while the number of cells on the other surfaces was equivalent to plastic. [3 H]Thymidine incorporation was inversely related to surface roughness. Alkaline phosphatase specific activity in isolated cells was found to decrease with increasing surface roughness, except for those cells cultured on CA. In contrast, enzyme activity in the cell layer was only decreased in cultures grown on FA‐ and TPS‐treated surfaces. A direct correlation between surface roughness and RNA and CDP production was found. Surface roughness had no apparent effect on NCP production. Proteoglycan synthesis by the cells was inhibited on all the surfaces studied, with the largest inhibition observed in the CA and EP groups. These results demonstrate that surface roughness alters osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and matrix production in vitro. The results also suggest that implant surface roughness may play a role in determining phenotypic expression of cells in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review
Wilson, C. J., Clegg, R. E., Leavesley, D. I., & Pearcy, M. J. (2005) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2005.11.1 · Cited by 1,696
Keselowsky, B. G., Collard, D. M., & García, A. J. (2003) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.10537 · Cited by 949
Gittens, R. A., McLachlan, T., Olivares-Navarrete, R., Cai, Y., Berner, S., Tannenbaum, R., Schwartz, Z., Sandhage, K. H., & Boyan, B. D. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029 · Cited by 827
Self-citationMacrophages, Foreign Body Giant Cells and Their Response to Implantable Biomaterials
Sheikh, Z., Brooks, P., Barzilay, O., Fine, N., & Glogauer, M. (2015) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma8095269 · Cited by 701
Refai, A. K., Textor, M., Brunette, D. M., & Waterfield, J. D. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30075 · Cited by 296
Dendritic cell responses to surface properties of clinical titanium surfaces
Kou, P. M., Schwartz, Z., Boyan, B. D., & Babensee, J. E. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.020 · Cited by 73
Self-citationFreeze-gelled silk fibroin protein scaffolds for potential applications in soft tissue engineering
Bhardwaj, N., Chakraborty, S., & Kundu, S. C. (2011) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.04.013 · Cited by 60
Kirmizidis, G., & Birch, M. A. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0137 · Cited by 49
Surface patterning: Tool to modulate stem cell differentiation in an adipose system
Chaubey, A., Ross, K. J., Leadbetter, R. M., & Burg, K. J. L. (2008) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30846 · Cited by 50
Lithium-free processing of silk fibroin
Zheng, Z., Guo, S., Liu, Y., Wu, J., Li, G., Liu, M., Wang, X., & Kaplan, D. (2016) · Journal of Biomaterials Applications · doi:10.1177/0885328216653259 · Cited by 45
Roch, T., Kratz, K., Ma, N., Jung, F., & Lendlein, A. (2013) · Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation · doi:10.3233/ch-131699 · Cited by 9
Surface-modified titanium to enhance osseointegration in dental implants
SARINNAPHAKORN, L., & DI SILVIO, L. (2009) · Cellular Response to Biomaterials · doi:10.1533/9781845695477.3.572 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, J. Y., Schwartz, Z., Hummert, T. W., Schraub, D. M., Simpson, J., Lankford, J., Dean, D. D., Cochran, D. L., & Boyan, B. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 389-401
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2018655931
- Cited by
- 1,111
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.