The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three‐dimensional nanofibrous poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) scaffolds
Abstract
Nanofibrous materials, by virtue of their morphological similarities to natural extracellular matrix, have been considered as candidate scaffolds for cell delivery in tissue‐engineering applications. In this study, we have evaluated a novel, three‐dimensional, nanofibrous poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold composed of electrospun nanofibers for its ability to maintain chondrocytes in a mature functional state. Fetal bovine chondrocytes (FBCs), maintained in vitro between passages 2 to 6, were seeded onto three‐dimensional biodegradable PCL nanofibrous scaffolds or as monolayers on standard tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) as a control substrate. Gene expression analysis by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction showed that chondrocytes seeded on the nanofibrous scaffold and maintained in serum‐free medium supplemented with ITS+, ascorbate, and dexamethasone continuously maintained their chondrocytic phenotype by expressing cartilage‐specific extracellular matrix genes, including collagen types II and IX, aggrecan, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein. Specifically, expression of the collagen type IIB splice variant transcript, which is indicative of the mature chondrocyte phenotype, was up‐regulated. FBCs exhibited either a spindle or round shape on the nanofibrous scaffolds, in contrast to a flat, well‐spread morphology seen in monolayer cultures on TCPS. Organized actin stress fibers were only observed in the cytoplasm of cells cultured on TCPS. Histologically, nanofibrous cultures maintained in the supplemented serum‐free medium produced more sulfated proteoglycan‐rich, cartilaginous matrix than monolayer cultures. In addition to promoting phenotypic differentiation, the nanofibrous scaffold also supported cellular proliferation as evidenced by a 21‐fold increase in cell growth over 21 days when the cultures were maintained in serum‐containing medium. These results indicate that the biological activities of FBCs are crucially dependent on the architecture of the extracellular scaffolds as well as the composition of the culture medium, and that nanofibrous PCL acts as a biologically preferred scaffold/substrate for proliferation and maintenance of the chondrocytic phenotype. We propose that the PCL nanofibrous structure may be a suitable candidate scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 67A: 1105–1114, 2003
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Giancotti, F. G., & Ruoslahti, E. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5430.1028 · Cited by 3,869
Cited by
The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century
Woodruff, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2010) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 · Cited by 4,033
Polymeric Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Application: A Review
Dhandayuthapani, B., Yoshida, Y., Maekawa, T., & Kumar, D. S. (2011) · International Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1155/2011/290602 · Cited by 1,773
Ding, D.-C., Shyu, W.-C., & Lin, S.-Z. (2011) · Cell Transplantation · doi:10.3727/096368910x · Cited by 894
Chung, C., & Burdick, J. A. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 · Cited by 760
Electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffolds
Lannutti, J., Reneker, D., Ma, T., Tomasko, D., & Farson, D. (2007) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.019 · Cited by 693
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., Danielson, K. G., Alexander, P. G., & Tuan, R. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10-29
- Volume
- 67A
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1105-1114
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2161061014
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three‐dimensional nanofibrous poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.10101
- The paper
- Li, W., Danielson, K. G., Alexander, P. G., & Tuan, R. S. (2003). Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three‐dimensional nanofibrous poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.