Cited by 693Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsBone Tissue Engineering Materials

Electrospinning for tissue engineering scaffolds

Lannutti, J., Reneker, D., Ma, T., Tomasko, D., Farson, D.·2007·Materials Science and Engineering: C

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.019

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lannutti, J., Reneker, D., Ma, T., Tomasko, D., & Farson, D.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Akron (US)
  • Florida A&M University - Florida State University College of Engineering (US)
Corresponding author
Lannutti, J.
Venue
Materials Science and Engineering: C
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
504-509
ISSN
0928-4931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014750067
Cited by
693
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 38
FWCI
9.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Materials Science and Engineering C (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
electrospinning, tissue engineering scaffolds, biomimetic scaffolds, surface topography, deposition efficiency, residual solvents, pore size, cell proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review