Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,117

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids

Oyane, Ayako, Kim, Hyun‐Min, Furuya, Takuo, Kokubo, Tadashi, Miyazaki, Toshiki, Nakamura, Takashi·2003·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

A simulated body fluid (SBF) with ion concentrations approximately equal to those of human blood plasma has been used widely for in vitro assessment of the bioactivity of artificial materials and for the formation of bone‐like apatite on various substrates. The ion concentrations of a conventional SBF (c‐SBF) are, however, not exactly equal to those of blood plasma. In the present study, a revision of c‐SBF was made to prepare new SBFs (r‐SBF, i‐SBF, and m‐SBF) with ion concentrations equal to or closer to those of blood plasma. The ion concentrations of the r‐SBF and i‐SBF were designed to be equal to those of blood plasma in total and dissociated amounts, respectively. The m‐SBF was designed to have a total ion concentration equal to that of blood plasma, except for the concentration of HCO, which was set to the saturated level with respect to calcite. The ion concentrations and pH of the as‐prepared new SBFs were found to be equal to those of the nominal values. Upon sealed storage, the r‐SBF and i‐SBF showed no change in ion concentrations for up to 4 weeks at 5°C, and up to 2 weeks at 36.5°C, but thereafter they showed a decrease in HCO concentration and an increase in pH. Under the same storage conditions, the c‐SBF and m‐SBF showed no change in ion concentrations and pH values over a period of up to 8 weeks. These results indicate that the r‐SBF and i‐SBF are less stable than the c‐SBF and m‐SBF in terms of changes in ion concentrations relative to storage period. The m‐SBF is optimal for in vitro bioactivity assessment of artificial materials and for biomimetic production of bone‐like apatite. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 65A: 188–195, 2003

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.10482

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,117

Metadata

Authors
Oyane, A., Kim, H., Furuya, T., Kokubo, T., Miyazaki, T., & Nakamura, T.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03-07
Volume
65A
Issue
2
Pages
188-195
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2014637539
Cited by
1,117
References
2
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.10482
The paper
Oyane, A., Kim, H., Furuya, T., Kokubo, T., Miyazaki, T., & Nakamura, T. (2003). Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10482

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.