Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Porous silk fibroin 3‐D scaffolds for delivery of bone morphogenetic protein‐2 in vitro and in vivo

Karageorgiou, Vassilis, Tomkins, Michael, Fajardo, Robert, Meinel, Lorenz, Snyder, Brian, Wade, Katherine, Chen, Jake, Vunjak‐Novakovic, Gordana, Kaplan, David L.·2006·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (BMP‐2) plays a key role in osteogenesis. Biomaterials used for the sustained delivery of BMP‐2 in vivo have shown therapeutic benefits. In the present study, BMP‐2 was loaded in porous silk fibroin scaffolds derived from silkworm cocoons (2.4 ± 0.14 μg per scaffold). The release profile of BMP‐2 under dynamic culture conditions (spinner flasks) showed that after 1 week in culture 25% of the initial BMP‐2 was retained adsorbed to the scaffold; up to 4 weeks no additional BMP‐2 was released. BMP‐2 induced human bone marrow stromal cells (hMSCs) to undergo osteogenic differentiation when the seeded scaffolds were cultured in medium supplemented with osteogenic stimulants for 4 weeks, based on elevated alkaline phosphatase activity, calcium deposition, and transcript levels for bone sialoprotein, osteopontin, osteocalcin, BMP‐2, and cbfa‐1. Micro‐computed tomography revealed densely deposited mineral at the center of the scaffolds. In contrast, hMSCs cultured in control scaffolds (no BMP‐2) exhibited limited osteogenesis. When implanted in critical sized cranial defects in mice, scaffolds loaded with BMP‐2 and seeded with hMSCs resulted in significant bone ingrowth. These results were qualitatively similar to scaffolds loaded with BMP‐2 but no hMSCs or with BMP‐2 and hMSCs but not pregrown into bone‐like tissue. Bone‐related outcomes were improved when compared with the scaffold controls implanted without BMP‐2. These studies illustrate the potential use of slow degrading silk fibroin 3‐D scaffolds loaded with BMP‐2, in combination with hMSCs, in osteogenesis studies in vitro and in vivo, and provide a new range of material properties for these applications. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.30728

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Karageorgiou, V., Tomkins, M., Fajardo, R., Meinel, L., Snyder, B., Wade, K., Chen, J., Vunjak‐Novakovic, G., & Kaplan, D. L.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-24
Volume
78A
Issue
2
Pages
324-334
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2119964073
Cited by
213
References
3
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porous silk fibroin 3‐D scaffolds for delivery of bone morphogenetic protein‐2 in vitro and in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.30728
The paper
Karageorgiou, V., Tomkins, M., Fajardo, R., Meinel, L., Snyder, B., Wade, K., Chen, J., Vunjak‐Novakovic, G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2006). Porous silk fibroin 3‐D scaffolds for delivery of bone morphogenetic protein‐2 in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30728

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.