Cited by 67biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Minimization of residual tin in the controlled Sn(II)octoate‐catalyzed polymerization of ε‐caprolactone

Stjerndahl, A., Finne‐Wistrand, A., Albertsson, A.‐C., Bäckesjö, C. M., Lindgren, U.·2008·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

By using less catalyst in the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone, a residual tin content of 5 ppm was reached without the need for additional purification. The initial amount of tin (II) 2‐ethylhexanoate [Sn(Oct) 2 ] was varied using catalyst:monomer ratios of 1:1000, 1:10,000, and 1:20,000. The impact on the final conversion, reaction control, average molecular weight, and polydispersity was studied. The amount of Sn(Oct) 2 could be significantly reduced without influencing the reaction results. The residual amount of tin was reduced from 176ppm with a catalyst:monomer ratio of 1:1000 in the polymer, to 5 ppm with the ratio 1:10,000. It was thus concluded that a catalyst:monomer ratio of 1:10,000 or lower is required to achieve a polymer with tin content suitable for biomedical applications. The materials were also tested in a proliferation study with mesenchymal stem cells from mouse. Porous scaffolds were fabricated from the polymers, using a salt leaching technique, and the cell growth on the porous scaffolds as well as on homogeneous films was determined by light absorbance measurements. In this study, the cell proliferation results showed that cells could grow on all polymers with an efficiency equal to or better than that on normal tissue culture plastic. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 2008

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.31733

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stjerndahl, A., Finne‐Wistrand, A., Albertsson, A. ‐., Bäckesjö, C. M., & Lindgren, U.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Albertsson, A.‐C.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-27
Volume
87A
Issue
4
Pages
1086-1091
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W1988280942
Cited by
67
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
ε-caprolactone, ring-opening polymerization, tin(II) 2-ethylhexanoate, polycaprolactone, mesenchymal stem cells, cell proliferation, porous scaffolds, salt leaching, biodegradable polymers
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Caproates, Cell Line, Lactones, Materials Testing, Polymers, Tin, Porosity, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review