Cited by 41Inhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

Evaluation of antitubercular drug‐loaded surfactants as inhalable drug‐delivery systems for pulmonary tuberculosis

Chimote, G., Banerjee, R.·2009·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Pulmonary tuberculosis is associated with a year‐long chemotherapy, poor alveolar drug levels, drug‐related systemic toxicity, and patient noncompliance. In this study, exogenous pulmonary surfactant is proposed as a drug carrier for antitubercular drugs. Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), the major lung‐surfactant lipid, has been combined with antitubercular drugs isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RFM), and ethambutol (ETH) in 1:1 ratio by weight, in which drugs had a ratio of 1:2:3 by weight. At 37°C, the formulation had better surfactant function with quicker reduction of surface tension on adsorption (32.71 ± 0.65 mN/m) than DPPC liposomes (44.67 ± 0.57 mN/m) and maintained 100% airway patency in a capillary surfactometer. Drug‐loaded surfactant liposomes were about 2 μm and had entrapment efficiency of 30.04% ± 2.05%, 18.85% ± 2.92%, and 61.47% ± 3.32% for INH, RFM, and ETH, respectively. Sustained release of the drugs from surfactants was observed over 24 h. In vitro alveolar deposition efficiency using the twin impinger showed 12.06% ± 1.87% of INH, 43.30% ± 0.87% of RFM, and 22.07% ± 2.02% of ETH deposited in the alveolar chamber upon nebulization for a minute using a jet nebulizer. The formulation was biocompatible and stable with physicochemical properties being retained even after storage for a month at 4°C. Antitubercular drug‐loaded surfactants developed could serve dual purposes of alveolar stabilization due to surfactant action and better reach of these drugs to the alveoli due to antiatelectatic effect of the surfactant. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.31959

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chimote, G., & Banerjee, R.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Corresponding author
Banerjee, R.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-22
Volume
89A
Issue
2
Pages
281-292
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2069778654
Cited by
41
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (IIT Bombay) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Keywords
pulmonary tuberculosis, antitubercular agents, DPPC, isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, pulmonary drug delivery, pulmonary surfactant, nebulization, sustained drug release, encapsulation efficiency
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Adsorption, Animals, Antitubercular Agents, Biocompatible Materials, Capillaries, Drug Stability, Humans, Liposomes, Particle Size, Surface-Active Agents, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Drug Delivery Systems, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review