Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 386 of the 386 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—Evidence‐based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis

Szczepiorkowski, Zbigniew M., Winters, Jeffrey L., Bandarenko, Nicholas, Kim, Haewon C., Linenberger, Michael L., Marques, Marisa B., Sarode, Ravindra, Schwartz, Joseph, Weinstein, Robert, Shaz, Beth H.·2010·Journal of Clinical Apheresis

Abstract

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence‐based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence‐based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2010. © 2010 American Society for Apheresis

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jca.20240

Cites

386 of 386 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Szczepiorkowski, Z. M., Winters, J. L., Bandarenko, N., Kim, H. C., Linenberger, M. L., Marques, M. B., Sarode, R., Schwartz, J., Weinstein, R., & Shaz, B. H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
83-177
ISSN
  • 0733-2459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1101
OpenAlex
W4242908792
Cited by
508
References
386
FWCI
60.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.