Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

TGF‐β1 is an organizer of responses to neurodgeneration

Finch, Caleb E., Laping, Nicholas J., Morgan, Todd E., Nichols, Nancy R., Pasinetti, Giulio M.·1993·Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

Abstract

TGF‐β1 mRNA and protein were recently found to increase in animal brains after experimental lesions that cause local deafferentation or neuron death. Elevations of TGF‐β1 mRNA after lesions are prominent in microglia but are also observed in neurons and astrocytes. Moreover, TGF‐β1 mRNA autoinduces its own mRNA in the brain. These responses provide models for studying the increases of TGF‐β1 protein observed in βA/amyloid‐containing extracellular plaques of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Down's syndrome (DS) and in brain cells of AIDS victims. Involvement of TGF‐β1 in these human brain disorders is discussed in relation to the potent effects of TGF‐β1 on wound healing and inflammatory responses in peripheral tissues. We hypothesize that TGF‐β1 and possibly other TGF‐β peptides have organizing roles in responses to neurodegeneration and brain injury that are similar to those observed in non‐neural tissues. Work from many laboratories has shown that activities of TGF‐β peptides on brain cells include chemotaxis, modification of extracellular matrix, and regulation of cytoskeletal gene expression and of neurotrophins. Similar activities of the TGF‐β's are well established in other tissues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcb.240530408

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disruption of BBB integrity can lead to an increased permeability of the endothelium for cholesterol-carrying lipoproteins and facilitate the exposure of blood-circulating components to neurons.

    “In addition, disruption of BBB integrity can lead to an increased permeability of the endothelium for cholesterol-carrying lipoproteins and facilitate the exposure of bloodcirculating components to neurons.[23][24][25]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Adams DO, 1992, The Macrophage, 75
  2. 10.1084/jem.176.1.255 · DOI
  3. Baler J, 1992, Res Immunol, 6, 650
  4. 10.1016/0923-2494(92)80052-M · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0006-291X(90)91229-L · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.8388126 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0165-5728(93)90214-J · DOI
  8. Delannet M, 1992, Development, 116, 275, 10.1242/dev.116.1.275 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/jnr.490240410 · DOI
  10. Flanders KC, 1991, Development, 113, 183, 10.1242/dev.113.1.183 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1161/01.STR.24.4.558 · DOI
  12. 10.1210/endo-129-1-517 · DOI
  13. Kerr DS, 1991, J Neurosci, 11, 1316, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-05-01316.1991 · DOI
  14. 10.1128/MCB.10.4.1492 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/0169-328X(92)90048-G · DOI
  16. 10.1002/jcp.1041440315 · DOI
  17. Lampert‐Etchells M, 1993, Neurodegeneration, 2, 111
  18. LapingNJ MorganTE NicholsNR RozovskyI FinchCE(1993):Neuroscience(in press).
  19. 10.1097/00001756-199204000-00001 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.2164258 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90195-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/330658a0 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/00001756-199009000-00003 · DOI
  24. 10.1083/jcb.117.2.395 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91000-5 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/jcp.1041550120 · DOI
  27. Mahmood R, 1992, Development, 115, 67, 10.1242/dev.115.1.67 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0165-3806(90)90233-O · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90190-J · DOI
  30. 10.1002/glia.440070114 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1002/glia.440040311 · DOI
  32. 10.1006/exnr.1993.1063 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0165-5728(92)90185-N · DOI
  34. Mummery CL, 1993, Int J Dev Biol, 37, 169
  35. 10.1002/jnr.490280114 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/1044-7431(91)90048-S · DOI
  37. NicholsNR DayJR LapingNJ JohnsonSA FinchCE(1993):Neurobiol Aging(in press).
  38. O'Conner‐McCourt MD, 1990, J Biol Chem, 262, 14090, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47909-4 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0014-4886(92)90028-O · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90583-2 · DOI
  41. PasinettiGM JohnsonSA OdaT RosovskyI FinchCE(1993):J Comp Neurol(in press).
  42. Perry VH, The Macrophage, 391
  43. 10.1084/jem.176.1.265 · DOI
  44. Pierce GF, 1991, J Lab Clin Invest, 117, 373
  45. 10.1016/0169-328X(91)90002-F · DOI
  46. Ponzoni M, 1992, Cancer Res, 52, 931
  47. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb13389.x · DOI
  48. 10.1007/978-3-642-49295-2_8 · DOI
  49. 10.1212/WNL.43.8.1609 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/jnr.490340105 · DOI
  51. 10.1083/jcb.115.2.473 · DOI
  52. Sapolsky RM, 1992, Stress, the Aging Brain, and Mechanisms of Neuron Death
  53. 10.1210/me.6.11.1825 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/0165-5728(90)90134-9 · DOI
  55. 10.1126/science.8323582 · DOI
  56. Sriram S, 1991, Neurology, 41, 219
  57. 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1286 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90082-Y · DOI
  59. 10.1097/00001756-199301000-00018 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/0197-4580(93)90006-W · DOI
  61. Van Obberghen‐Schilling E, 1988, J Biol Chem, 263, 7741, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68561-8 · DOI
  62. 10.1084/jem.173.4.981 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/BF00918135 · DOI
  64. Welch GR, 1990, J Immunol, 144, 3444, 10.4049/jimmunol.144.9.3444 · DOI
  65. 10.1002/jnr.490270106 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90364-F · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Finch, C. E., Laping, N. J., Morgan, T. E., Nichols, N. R., & Pasinetti, G. M.
Venue
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-12
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
314-322
ISSN
  • 0730-2312
  • 1097-4644
Cited by
165
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review