Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophage polarity in cancer: A review

Najafi, Masoud, Hashemi Goradel, Nasser, Farhood, Bagher, Salehi, Eniseh, Nashtaei, Maryam Shabani, Khanlarkhani, Neda, Khezri, Zahra, Majidpoor, Jamal, Abouzaripour, Morteza, Habibi, Mohsen, Kashani, Iraj Ragerdi, Mortezaee, Keywan·2019·Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

Abstract

Macrophages are the most abundant cells within the tumor stroma displaying noticeable plasticity, which allows them to perform several functions within the tumor microenvironment. Tumor‐associated macrophages commonly refer to an alternative M2 phenotype, exhibiting anti‐inflammatory and pro‐tumoral effects. M2 cells are highly versatile and multi‐tasking cells that directly influence multiple steps in tumor development, including cancer cell survival, proliferation, stemness, and invasiveness along with angiogenesis and immunosuppression. M2 cells perform these functions through critical interactions with cells related to tumor progression, including Th2 cells, cancer‐associated fibroblasts, cancer cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and myeloid‐derived suppressor cells. M2 cells also have negative cross‐talks with tumor suppressor cells, including cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells. Programed death‐1 (PD‐1) is one of the key receptors expressed in M2 cells that, upon interaction with its ligand PD‐L1, plays cardinal roles for induction of immune evasion in cancer cells. In addition, M2 cells can neutralize the effects of the pro‐inflammatory and anti‐tumor M1 phenotype. Classically activated M1 cells express high levels of major histocompatibility complex molecules, and the cells are strong killers of cancer cells. Therefore, orchestrating M2 reprogramming toward an M1 phenotype would offer a promising approach for reversing the fate of tumor and promoting cancer regression. Macrophage switching toward an anti‐inflammatory M1 phenotype could be used as an adjuvant with other approaches, including radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockades, such as anti‐PD‐L1/PD‐1 strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcb.27646

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Najafi, M., Hashemi Goradel, N., Farhood, B., Salehi, E., Nashtaei, M. S., Khanlarkhani, N., Khezri, Z., Majidpoor, J., Abouzaripour, M., Habibi, M., Kashani, I. R., & Mortezaee, K.
Venue
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-30
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
2756-2765
ISSN
  • 0730-2312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4644
OpenAlex
W2895594057
Cited by
489
References
43
FWCI
14.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrophage polarity in cancer: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcb.27646
The paper
Najafi, M., Hashemi Goradel, N., Farhood, B., Salehi, E., Nashtaei, M. S., Khanlarkhani, N., Khezri, Z., Majidpoor, J., Abouzaripour, M., Habibi, M., Kashani, I. R., & Mortezaee, K. (2019). Macrophage polarity in cancer: A review. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27646

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.