Cited by 49Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A short version of the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills

Höfling, Volkmar, Ströhle, Gunnar, Michalak, Johannes, Heidenreich, Thomas·2011·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS; Baer, Smith, & Allen, 2004) is a 39-item self-report measure for the assessment of four different mindfulness factors. This study aimed at developing a short version of the German adaptation of the KIMS (KIMS-Short). Confirmatory factor analyses were carried out with two samples (N = 469 and N = 602) to develop subscales with fewer items and to confirm the factor structure of the KIMS-Short. Furthermore, the relations between the KIMS-Short subscales and other scales were evaluated. The KIMS-Short with its 20 items enable researchers to replicate the basic factor structure of four separate mindfulness skills. However, the analyses for the "observing" subscale revealed two different but strongly correlated factors depending on whether the observed stimuli were internal or external phenomena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.20778

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Höfling, V., Ströhle, G., Michalak, J., & Heidenreich, T.
Affiliations
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Esslingen University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Höfling, Volkmar
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-03
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
639-645
ISSN
0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083970413
Cited by
49
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mindfulness skills, short-form scale development, German adaptation, factor structure, self-report measures
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Awareness, Behavior, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Germany, Humans, Kentucky, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review