Cited by 41Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Narcissistic Pathology as Core Personality Dysfunction: Comparing the DSM‐IV and the DSM‐5 Proposal for Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Morey, Leslie C., Stagner, Brian H.·2012·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Narcissistic personality disorder and related concepts have a complex history and have been subject to extensive theoretical discourse but relatively little empirical research. An initial proposal for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) that suggested eliminating this disorder as a discrete personality disorder type met with considerable controversy that ultimately led to its reinstatement in subsequent proposals. Nonetheless, the DSM-5 proposal for personality disorders as a whole would involve a significantly different formulation of narcissistic personality from that described in DSM-IV-one that places a greater emphasis on shared deficits among all personality disorders that tap elements thought to fall on the narcissistic spectrum, such as deficits in empathic capacity. This article describes this revised formulation, and presents a case study that illustrates the similarities and differences in the DSM-IV and proposed DSM-5 portrayal of narcissistic issues and related clinical problems over the course of a particular treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.21895

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The decision to exclude some PDs was purportedly made to reduce co-occurrence among the PDs and because some literature bases were viewed as small.

    “Although the decision to exclude some PDs was purportedly made to reduce co-occurrence among the PDs and because some literature bases were viewed as small (Blashfield & Intoccia 2000, Morey & Stagner 2012), these decisions were widely criticized by some members of the workgroup (Livesley 2013, Krueger 2013) and researchers in the field (Blashfield & Reynolds 2012, Miller et al. 2010b, Widiger 201”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Morey & Stagner 2012

  • The requirement that all manifestations share certain trait elevations would ensure that different presentations overlap to a greater degree and would likely improve the discriminant validity of vulnerable narcissism by making it less of a general and diffuse marker of psychopathology.

    “The requirement that all manifestations share certain trait elevations would ensure that these different presentations overlap to a greater degree and would likely improve the discriminant validity of vulnerable narcissism by making it less of a general and diffuse marker of psychopathology (Morey & Stagner 2012).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Morey & Stagner 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Freud S., 1914, Collected Papers, 30
  2. Morey L. C., 2005, World psychiatric association series: Evidence and experience in psychiatry, 328
  3. Ronningstam E. F., 2005, World psychiatric association series: Evidence and experience in psychiatry, 277

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morey, L. C., & Stagner, B. H.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Morey, Leslie C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-21
Volume
68
Issue
8
Pages
908-921
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W1512810241
Cited by
41
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
narcissistic personality disorder, narcissistic pathology, DSM-5, DSM-IV, personality disorders, diagnostic classification, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Narcissism, Personality Disorders, Prognosis, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review