Cited by 129Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Conceptions of Narcissism and the DSM-5 Pathological Personality Traits

Open access
Wright, Aidan G. C., Pincus, Aaron L., Thomas, Katherine M., Hopwood, Christopher J., Markon, Kristian E., Krueger, Robert F.·2013·Assessment

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5) features two conceptions of Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD), one based on the retained DSM-IV's categorical diagnosis and the other based on a model that blends impairments in personality functioning with a specific trait profile intended to recapture DSM-IV NPD. Nevertheless, the broader literature contains a richer array of potential conceptualizations of narcissism, including distinguishable perspectives from psychiatric nosology, clinical observation and theory, and social/personality psychology. This raises questions about the most advantageous pattern of traits to use to reflect various conceptions of narcissistic pathology via the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5). In this study, we examine the associations of the Personality Disorder Questionnaire-Narcissistic Personality Disorder scale, Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16, and the Pathological Narcissism Inventory and the PID-5 dimensions and facets in a large sample (N = 1,653) of undergraduate student participants. Results point to strong associations with PID-5 Antagonism scales across narcissism measures, consistent with the DSM-5's proposed representation of NPD. However, additional notable associations emerged with PID-5 Negative Affectivity and Psychoticism scales when considering more clinically relevant narcissism measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191113486692

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across three samples (N = 2,057), so-called normal or adaptive narcissism manifests substantial correlations with DSM-5 section III PD traits from the domain of antagonism, including grandiosity, attention seeking, manipulativeness, callousness, deceitfulness, and hostility (mean r = 0.63, 0.52, 0.50, 0.42, 0.38, and 0.31, respectively).

    “Across three samples (N = 2,057) (Miller et al. 2013a(Miller et al. ,b, 2014a,b;,b;Wright et al. 2013), so-called normal or adaptive narcissism manifests substantial correlations with DSM-5 section III PD traits from the domain of antagonism, including grandiosity, attention seeking, manipulativeness, callousness, deceitfulness, and hostility (mean r = 0.63, 0.52, 0.50, 0.42, 0.38, and 0.31,”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Wright et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A. L., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Assessment
Published
2013-04-21
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
339-352
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2151693960
Cited by
129
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH097325)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, DSM-5, pathological personality traits, Pathological Narcissism Inventory, antagonism, negative affectivity, psychoticism, personality functioning, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Narcissism, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Regression Analysis, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review