Cited by 25Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychology and Mental HealthCounseling Practices and Supervision

Case Mis‐Conceptualization in Psychological Treatment: An Enduring Clinical Problem

Ridley, Charles R., Jeffrey, Christina E., Roberson, Richard B.·2017·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Case conceptualization, an integral component of mental health treatment, aims to facilitate therapeutic gains by formulating a clear picture of a client's psychological presentation. However, despite numerous attempts to improve this clinical activity, it remains unclear how well existing methods achieve their purported purpose. Case formulation is inconsistently defined in the literature and implemented in practice, with many methods varying in complexity, theoretical grounding, and empirical support. In addition, many of the methods demand a precise clinical acumen that is easily influenced by judgmental and inferential errors. These errors occur regardless of clinicians’ level of training or amount of clinical experience. Overall, the lack of a consensus definition, a diversity of methods, and susceptibility of clinicians to errors are manifestations of the state of crisis in case conceptualization. This article, the 2nd in a series of 5 on thematic mapping, argues the need for more reliable and valid models of case conceptualization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.22354

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ridley, C. R., Jeffrey, C. E., & Roberson, R. B.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Ridley, Charles R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-13
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
359-375
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2572126093
Cited by
25
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
case formulation, therapeutic relationship, psychotherapy, thematic mapping
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Models, Psychological, Professional Competence, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review