Cited by 1,062Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Social Influence

The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring

Kruglanski, Arie W, Freund, Tallie·1983·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evaluation apprehension, or the concern that one's decisions will be reviewed, has been shown to reduce bias in assessments of individuals.

    “Evaluation apprehension (Cottrell, 1972), or the concern that one's decisions will be reviewed, has been shown to reduce bias in assessments of individuals (Kruglanski and Freund, 1983).”

    From Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization (2017) · cites this paper as Kruglanski and Freund, 1983

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Kruglanski, Arie W
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-09
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
448-468
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022965677
Cited by
1,062
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 41
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
primacy effect, ethnic stereotyping, time pressure, evaluation apprehension, alternative hypothesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review