Cited by 12Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCounseling Practices and Supervision

An explanatory sequential investigation of the working alliance as a change process in videoconferencing psychotherapy

Open access
Norwood, Carl, Sabin‐Farrell, Rachel, Malins, Sam, Moghaddam, Nima G.·2021·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: Debate exists as to patient experience, and the importance, of the working alliance (WA) in videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP). This study used a two-phase explanatory sequential design to investigate the WA as a change process in VCP. METHODS: Phase I: sessional VCP outcome and WA data were analysed using multilevel modelling (n = 46). Phase II: participants (n = 12) from Phase I were recruited to semi-structured interviews, analysed using thematic framework analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate: (1) a significant correlation between WA and outcome (F(1, 15.19) = 25.01, p < 0.001), (2) previous session WA significantly predicted outcome in the next session (F(1, 355.61) = 4.47, p < 0.05), and (3) previous session outcome significantly predicted next session WA (F(1, 55.3) = 15.19, p < 0.001), with three core themes explaining patient experience (engaging with the medium, connection with the therapist, and working via the medium). Results are discussed and future research recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.23112

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norwood, C., Sabin‐Farrell, R., Malins, S., & Moghaddam, N. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Norwood, Carl
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-22
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1330-1353
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W3004233989
Cited by
12
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR300822, NIHR301292)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, external beam radiotherapy, change processes, patient experience
MeSH terms
Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review