Cited by 22Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Valuing Questionnaire in Colombian clinical and nonclinical samples

Open access
Ruiz, Francisco J., Suárez‐Falcón, Juan C., Segura‐Vargas, Miguel A., Gil‐Luciano, Bárbara·2022·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) in Colombian clinical and nonclinical samples. METHOD: The VQ was administered to a total sample of 1820 participants, which included undergraduates (N = 762), general population (N = 724), and a clinical sample (N = 334). The questionnaire packages included measures of experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, mindfulness, life satisfaction, and psychological difficulties. RESULTS: Across the different samples, internal consistency was good (global Cronbach's alpha of 0.83 for Progress and 0.82 for obstruction). Measurement invariance was found across samples and gender, and the two-factor model obtained a good fit to the data. The latent means of progress and obstruction of the clinical sample were lower and higher, respectively, than the latent means of the nonclinical samples. Correlations with other variables were in the expected direction. CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the VQ showed good psychometric properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.23212

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz, F. J., Suárez‐Falcón, J. C., Segura‐Vargas, M. A., & Gil‐Luciano, B.
Affiliations
  • Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz (CO)
  • Faculty of Psychology Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED) Madrid Spain
  • Madrid Institute of Contextual Psychology Madrid Spain
Corresponding author
Ruiz, Francisco J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-07-09
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
233-248
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W3181702924
Cited by
22
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Espacio Tiempo y Forma Serie I Prehistoria y Arqueología (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UNED repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
Spanish adaptation, experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, mindfulness, life satisfaction, psychological difficulties, measurement invariance, two-factor model, Colombian population
MeSH terms
Colombia, Humans, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review