Cited by 28Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Remote cognitive‐behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary meta‐analysis

Open access
Trenoska Basile, Vesna, Newton‐John, Toby, Wootton, Bethany M.·2022·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a chronic mental health condition that results in significant individual, societal, and economic burden. While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is well established as an efficacious treatment for GAD, individuals have identified several logistical barriers to accessing face‐to‐face CBT. Remotely delivered treatments address many of these treatment barriers. Methods: The aim of the current study was to synthesize the current literature on the efficacy of remote CBT for GAD using a meta‐analytic approach. Relevant articles were identified through an electronic database search and 10 studies (with 11 remote conditions and 1071 participants) were included in the meta‐analysis. Results: Within‐group findings indicate that remote CBT for GAD results in large effect sizes from pretreatment to posttreatment ( g = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03−1.58). Both low intensity and high intensity remote CBT interventions were found to result in large effect sizes ( g = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.11−1.61 and g = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.20−1.47, respectively), with no significant differences between the treatment formats ( Q 1 = 2.28, p = 0.13). Between‐group effect sizes were medium in size at posttreatment ( g = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.47−1.06). Conclusions: These findings have potential implications for the delivery of evidence‐based treatment for GAD and the inclusion of remote methods in stepped care treatment approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.23360

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trenoska Basile, V., Newton‐John, T., & Wootton, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Discipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Wootton, Bethany M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-11
Volume
78
Issue
12
Pages
2381-2395
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W4223455797
Cited by
28
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, telemedicine, treatment efficacy, stepped care, low-intensity intervention
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review