Cited by 467Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsResearch Data Management PracticesBusiness Strategies and Management Research

Selecting Studies and Collecting Data

Higgins, Julian PT, Deeks, Jonathan J·2008·Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Selecting studies What data to collect Sources of data Data collection forms Extracting data from reports Extracting study results and converting to the desired format Managing data Chapter information References

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470712184.ch7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interrater agreement between reviewers for study selection was 0.85 in the first step and 0.89 in the second step, indicating very good agreement.

    “Cohen κ [21] was calculated to assess interrater agreement between reviewers, which was 0.85 and 0.89 in the first and second step of the selection process, respectively, indicating a very good level of agreement [22].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higgins, J. P., & Deeks, J. J.
Affiliations
  • MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-22
Pages
151-185
OpenAlex
W1509553110
Cited by
467
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
study selection, data collection, data collection forms, data management, research outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review