Cited by 50Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Social media use and parent–child relationship: A cross‐sectional study of adolescents

Sampasa‐Kanyinga, Hugues, Goldfield, Gary S., Kingsbury, Mila, Clayborne, Zahra, Colman, Ian·2020·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

We examined the association between social media use and parent–child relationship quality and tested whether this association is independent of total screen time. Data on 9,732 students (48.4% female) aged 11–20 years were obtained from a provincially representative school‐based survey. Heavy use of social media (daily use of more than 2 hr) was associated with greater odds of negative relationships between mother–daughter (odds ratio [OR] = 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27–2.52), father–daughter (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.16–2.09), father–son (OR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.58–3.05) but not mother–son (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.88–1.55). Results were similar after further adjusting for total screen time. There were no significant associations between regular use of social media (2 hr or less) and parent–child relationships. These findings suggest that heavy use of social media is associated with negative parent–child relationships. Longitudinal research is necessary to disentangle the pathways between social media use and the parent–child relationship.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.22293

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A cross-sectional survey of Canadian adolescents found that heavy SMU (3 or more hours per day) was associated with greater odds of negative reported relationships between mothers and daughters, fathers and daughters and fathers and sons, but not mothers and sons.

    “One of few studies examining SMU and family connectedness, a cross-sectional survey of Canadian adolescents [29] found that heavy SMU (3 or more hours per day) was associated with greater odds of negative reported relationships between mothers and daughters, fathers and daughters and fathers and sons, but not mothers and sons.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sampasa‐Kanyinga, H., Goldfield, G. S., Kingsbury, M., Clayborne, Z., & Colman, I.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Sampasa‐Kanyinga, Hugues
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-28
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
793-803
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W2991098148
Cited by
50
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social media use, parent-child relationship, adolescents, screen time, mother-daughter relationships, father-son relationship, family relationships, gender differences
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Ontario, Parent-Child Relations, Students, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review