Cited by 111Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyMedia and Digital Communication

Social media use and social connectedness among adolescents in the United Kingdom: a qualitative exploration of displacement and stimulation

Open access
Winstone, Lizzy, Mars, Becky, Haworth, Claire M. A., Kidger, Judi·2021·BMC Public Health

Abstract

Background: Connectedness to family and peers is a key determinant of adolescent mental health. Existing research examining associations between social media use and social connectedness has been largely quantitative and has focused primarily on loneliness, or on specific aspects of peer relationships. In this qualitative study we use the displacement hypothesis and the stimulation hypothesis as competing theoretical lenses through which we examine the complex relationship between social media use and feelings of connectedness to family and peers. Methods: In-depth paired and individual interviews were conducted with twenty-four 13–14-year-olds in two inner-city English secondary schools. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and thematically analysed. Results: Analysis identified four themes: (i) ‘Displacement of face-to-face socialising’ (ii) ‘Social obligations’ (iii) ‘(Mis)Trust’ and (iv) ‘Personal and group identity’. Results indicated stronger support for the stimulation hypothesis than the displacement hypothesis. We found evidence of a complex set of reciprocal and circular relationships between social media use and connectedness consistent with a ‘rich-get-richer’ and a ‘poor-get-poorer’ effect for family and peer connectedness – and a ‘poor-get-richer’ effect in peer connectedness for those who find face-to-face interactions difficult. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that parents should take a measured approach to social media use, providing clear guidance, promoting trust and responsible time management, and acknowledging the role of social media in making connections. Understanding and sharing in online experiences is likely to promote social connectedness. Supporting young people to negotiate breathing space in online interactions and prioritising trust over availability in peer relationships may optimise the role of social media in promoting peer connectedness.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This qualitative study used displacement and stimulation hypotheses to explore how social media use relates to family and peer connectedness among 13–14-year-olds in England. It found stronger support for stimulation than displacement, alongside complex reciprocal effects including rich-get-richer, poor-get-poorer, and poor-get-richer patterns.

Key findings

  • Four themes were identified: “Displacement of face-to-face socialising,” “Social obligations,” “(Mis)Trust,” and “Personal and group identity.”
  • Results indicated stronger support for the stimulation hypothesis than the displacement hypothesis, with social media often used to maintain or expand connections when face-to-face socialising was not possible.
  • The authors describe a complex set of reciprocal and circular relationships, including a “rich-get-richer” and “poor-get-poorer” effect for family and peer connectedness, and a “poor-get-richer” effect in peer connectedness for those who find face-to-face interactions difficult.
  • Participants also described “over-stimulation” through obligations to be available and provide positive feedback, and fear of screenshotting undermined trust and peer connectedness.

Methods

  • In-depth paired and individual interviews were conducted with 24 Year 9 students aged 13–14 years (19 girls and five boys) in February–March 2020.
  • Interviews took place at two inner-city English secondary schools; 13 interviews were conducted, lasting between 45 min and an hour, using a topic guide developed with a young people’s advisory board.
  • Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded in NVivo 12, and thematically analysed using an inductive, reflexive approach from a critical realist perspective.

Limitations

  • The paper states the sample size was somewhat smaller than planned due to COVID-19, with boys in particular under-represented.
  • The paper states participants were not selected based on how much or why they used social media, so additional patterns of social media use may exist in this age group that were not captured.
  • The paper states all participants were aged 13–14 and attended inner-city secondary schools in one area of the country, so caution should be exercised in generalising findings to other populations; the text also makes evident that findings rely on self-report and that participants were not asked to provide feedback on the findings.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-021-11802-9

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 32 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    There is evidence of a complex set of reciprocal and circular relationships between social media use and connectedness consistent with a 'rich-get-richer' and a 'poor-get-poorer' effect for family and peer connectedness.

    “We found evidence of a complex set of reciprocal and circular relationships between social media use and connectedness consistent with a ‘rich-get-richer’ and a ‘poor-get-poorer’ effect for family and peer connectedness – and a ‘poor-get-richer’ effect in peer connectedness for those who find face-to-face interactions difficult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There is a 'poor-get-richer' effect in peer connectedness for those who find face-to-face interactions difficult.

    “We found evidence of a complex set of reciprocal and circular relationships between social media use and connectedness consistent with a ‘rich-get-richer’ and a ‘poor-get-poorer’ effect for family and peer connectedness – and a ‘poor-get-richer’ effect in peer connectedness for those who find face-to-face interactions difficult.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Results indicated stronger support for the stimulation hypothesis than the displacement hypothesis.

    “Results indicated stronger support for the stimulation hypothesis than the displacement hypothesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    This trust was generally reciprocated by participants, several of whom trusted their parents or other family members to follow their social media accounts as a form of protection.

    “This was generally reciprocated by participants, several whom trusted their parents or other family members to follow their social media accounts as a form of protection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Participants' own SMU was sometimes felt to displace face-to-face social activities that promote feelings of connectedness.

    “Participants’ own SMU was sometimes felt to displace face-to-face social activities that promote feelings of connectedness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 62
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four themes were identified: (i) 'Displacement of face-to-face socialising' (ii) 'Social obligations' (iii) '(Mis)Trust' and (iv) 'Personal and group identity'.

    “Analysis identified four themes: (i) ‘Displacement of face-to-face socialising’ (ii) ‘Social obligations’ (iii) ‘(Mis)Trust’ and (iv) ‘Personal and group identity’.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While many participants accepted this etiquette as part of everyday peer relationships, others described it as time-consuming and 'overwhelming', with some feeling 'forced' to like or comment on a friend's post.

    “While many participants accepted this etiquette as part of everyday peer relationships, others described it as time-consuming and ‘overwhelming’ (F15), with some feeling ‘forced’ (M4) to like or comment on a friend’s post.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    SMU was often credited with expansion of participants' social circle through making new friends online, both by offering opportunities for new introductions and by facilitating development of friendships through initial online communication, which felt less intimidating than new face-to-face socialising.

    “In addition to maintaining stability within their social circle, SMU was also often credited with expansion of participants’ social circle through making new friends online, both by offering opportunities for new introductions, such as through a ‘mutual friend’ (F5), and by facilitating the development of friendships through initial online communication, which felt less intimidating than new face”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This following was generally framed positively as overseeing participants' SMU for their protection, either in terms of giving advice about data privacy or inappropriate posts, or in more practical terms, whereby geographical tags can help parents locate young people if they are unable to contact them.

    “This was generally framed positively as overseeing participants’ SMU for their protection, either in terms of giving advice about data privacy or inappropriate posts (F17), or in more practical terms, whereby geographical tags can help parents locate young people if they are unable to contact them (M4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Online peer interactions frequently took place when in-person socialising was not possible, helping to alleviate feelings of boredom and loneliness.

    “However, online peer interactions frequently took place when in-person socialising was not possible, helping to alleviate feelings of boredom and loneliness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported feeling obliged - in line with social norms - to respond promptly to messages from peers and to provide positive feedback on peers' social media posts.

    “Participants reported feeling obliged – in line with social norms – to respond promptly to messages from peers and to provide positive feedback on peers’ social media posts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    We found some evidence of online enhanced self-disclosure in our sample - in line with the stimulation hypothesis - whereby features of online communication facilitate sharing of intimate information, leading to better quality relationships.

    “We found some evidence of online enhanced self-disclosure in our sample – in line with the stimulation hypothesis – whereby features of online communication facilitate sharing of intimate information, leading to better quality relationships [28].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Desjarlais M, Joseph JJ. Socially interactive and passive technologies enhance friendship quality: an investigation of the mediating roles of online and offline self-disclosure. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(5):286–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0363. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One participant felt a lack of trust to be left in charge of their own SMU, with implications for responding to adverse online experiences.

    “One exception to this provided an example of a more complicated relationship with parents and felt a lack of trust to be left in charge of their own SMU, with implications for responding to adverse online experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participant F12 described the process of commenting and liking on others' posts as 'trading' to boost perceived popularity for enhanced peer status.

    “Participant F12 described the process of commenting and liking on others’ posts as ‘trading’ to boost perceived popularity for enhanced peer status.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Whilst SMU enhanced feelings of connectedness through enabling participants to keep in touch with others, this was frequently accompanied by demanding expectations amongst peers.

    “Whilst SMU enhanced feelings of connectedness through enabling participants to keep in touch with others, this was frequently accompanied by demanding expectations amongst peers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Where close friends were felt to be trustworthy, social media provided opportunities for self-disclosure, fostering intimacy and improving peer connectedness in a virtuous cycle.

    “Where close friends were felt to be trustworthy, social media provided opportunities for self-disclosure, fostering intimacy in the relationship, and improving peer connectedness in a virtuous cycle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were no systematic differences in opinions and experiences between participants from the two different schools or those interviewed individually compared to with others.

    “There were no systematic differences in opinions and experiences between participants from the two different schools or those interviewed individually compared to with others, so comparisons are not presented here.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Some participants pointed to the possibility of excessive SMU displacing time spent socialising in person with friends, leading some young people to 'distance themselves from family and friends'.

    “As with family interactions, some participants pointed to the possibility of excessive SMU displacing time spent socialising in person with friends, leading some young people to ‘distance themselves from family and friends’ (M5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    F1 felt that her parents' dogmatic approach to social media prevented her reporting online sexual harassment in case she was no longer allowed to use certain apps.

    “This is evident in contrasting comments from F14, who was comfortable approaching their mother for help with online peer relationships, and F1, who felt that her parents’ dogmatic approach to social media prevented her reporting online sexual harassment in case she was no longer allowed to use certain apps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Those participants with parents who had demonstrated their trust reported feeling able to discuss and ask for advice on difficult issues encountered on social media, whereas those with less trusting parents felt reluctant to approach their parents for fear of repercussions.

    “Those participants with parents who had demonstrated their trust reported feeling able to discuss and ask for advice on difficult issues encountered on social media, whereas those with less trusting parents felt reluctant to approach their parents for fear of repercussions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This obligation was sometimes accompanied by feeling overwhelmed by multiple messages or group chats, guilt associated with making excuses for unavailability or outright peer conflict if expectations were not met.

    “This was sometimes accompanied by feeling overwhelmed by multiple messages or group chats, guilt associated with making excuses for unavailability or outright peer conflict if expectations were not met.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Several participants explained their motivation for commenting on a friend's post as an act of altruism to boost others' self-esteem, stimulating peer connectedness through provision of emotional support and mutual respect.

    “Several participants explained their motivation for commenting on a friend’s post as an act of altruism to boost others’ self-esteem, stimulating peer connectedness through provision of emotional support and mutual respect (F4, F5, F10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Social network expansion was highlighted as a key benefit of SMU, meeting new people, and maintaining contact with old friends outside of school and family members abroad.

    “Social network expansion was also highlighted as a key benefit of SMU, meeting new people, and maintaining contact with old friends outside of school and family members abroad.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Others gave opinions aligned with the stimulation hypothesis, whereby online socialising facilitated offline interaction when they felt their own personalities to be 'shy' or socially 'awkward' - a social compensation effect.

    “Others gave opinions more aligned with the stimulation hypothesis, whereby online socialising facilitated offline interaction when they felt their own personalities to be ‘shy’ or socially ‘awkward’ (F6) – a social compensation effect [26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Social consequences of the internet for adolescents: a decade of research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009;18(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants often discussed their online communication in obligation-related terms as a means of avoiding conflict with peers, or as a chore necessary to adhere to social norms.

    “Participants often discussed their online communication in obligation-related terms as a means of avoiding conflict with peers, or as a chore necessary to adhere to social norms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Being available to take part in multiple online conversations simultaneously was felt to be 'stressful' and 'a mess in my mind', with ending conversations causing difficulty for several participants.

    “Being available to take part in multiple online conversations simultaneously was felt to be ‘stressful’ and ‘a mess in my mind’ (M4), with ending conversations causing difficulty for several participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Young people felt they were trusted to behave responsibly online and in turn trusted authority figures to provide guidance regarding challenges encountered without fear of access to social media being removed or restricted.

    “Young people felt they were trusted to behave responsibly online and in turn trusted authority figures to provide guidance regarding challenges encountered without fear of access to social media being removed or restricted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Perceived benefits of SMU that emerged in this sample included the expansion of social networks, the ability to keep in touch with friends and family (including those for whom geographical constraints prevent offline socialising), enhanced self-disclosure for socially awkward young people or among very close friends, and supporting identity development and feelings of belonging.

    “Perceived benefits of SMU that emerged in this sample included the expansion of social networks, the ability to keep in touch with friends and family (including those for whom geographical constraints prevent offline socialising), enhanced self-disclosure for socially awkward young people or among very close friends, and supporting identity development and feelings of belonging.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The young people in our sample were acutely aware of the risks of identity theft and of engaging online with potentially dangerous strangers.

    “The young people in our sample were thus acutely aware of the risks of identity theft and of engaging online with potentially dangerous strangers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For many participants the risk of screenshots being taken and shared presented a substantial barrier to online self-disclosure, with some saying they would not trust even close friends with sensitive information sent over social media.

    “For many participants the risk of screenshots being taken and shared presented a substantial barrier to online self-disclosure (Fig. 1), with some saying they would not trust even close friends with sensitive information sent over social media.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    It was often the case that online peer interactions took place mainly when in person socialising was not possible, providing opportunities to socialise and maintain peer relationships online in the absence of offline opportunities.

    “However, it was often the case that online peer interactions took place mainly when in person socialising was not possible, providing opportunities to socialise and maintain peer relationships online in the absence of offline opportunities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Those experiencing increased SMU in place of family socialising tended to relay lower levels of family connectedness that preceded the SMU, with SMU used strategically to overcome feelings of loneliness in the home.

    “Those experiencing increased SMU in place of family socialising tended to relay lower levels of family connectedness that preceded the SMU, with SMU used strategically to overcome feelings of loneliness in the home.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Young people reported feeling pressures of expectation around providing feedback on friends' online posts and being constantly available for communication.

    “In addition to the positive aspects of SMU, young people reported feeling pressures of expectation around providing feedback on friends’ online posts and being constantly available for communication.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Four themes were identified: i) 'Displacement of face-to-face socialising' (ii) 'Social obligations' (iii) '(Mis)Trust' and (iv) 'Personal and group identity'.

    “Four themes were identified: i) ‘Displacement of face-to-face socialising’ (ii) ‘Social obligations’ (iii) ‘(Mis)Trust’ and (iv) ‘Personal and group identity’.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Others reserved any content sharing only for trusted close friends, and only using certain apps such as Snapchat where users are notified if someone has taken a screenshot.

    “Others reserved any content sharing only for trusted close friends, and only using certain apps such as Snapchat where users are notified if someone has taken a screenshot.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Young people in our sample reported using social media to share experiences, such as passively watching entertaining content together with friends and family members, as well as actively co-producing content, with privacy settings used to demarcate friendship group boundaries to different degrees of closeness.

    “Young people in our sample reported using social media to share experiences, such as passively watching entertaining content together with friends and family members, as well as actively co-producing content, with privacy settings used to demarcate friendship group boundaries to different degrees of closeness (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The topic guide was developed following consultation with a young people's advisory board.

    “The guide was developed following consultation with a young people’s advisory board – a group of 11–18-year-olds with experience in advising on the design of health-related research materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    An inductive, reflexive approach to thematic analysis was used from a critical realist (contextualist) perspective.

    “An inductive, reflexive approach to thematic analysis was used from a critical realist (contextualist) perspective [25].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2020;14:1–25.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The displacement hypothesis posits that online engagement and expansion of social networks are primarily with weak ties rather than close family and friends, and are of little benefit to psychosocial well-being.

    “Where used for communication purposes, online engagement and expansion of social networks were thought to be primarily with weak ties rather than with close family and friends, and as such, of little benefit to psychosocial well-being [11, 13].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukophadhyay T, Scherlis W. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol. 1998 Sep;53(9):1017–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [13] Turkle S. Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Hachette UK; 2017.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The displacement and stimulation hypotheses, developed for internet use, are applicable to social media use.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both the stimulation and displacement hypotheses may be possible, depending on both the amount and type of SMU.

    “This indicates that rather than being mutually exclusive theories, both the stimulation and displacement hypotheses may be possible, depending on both the amount and type of SMU [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Nowland R, Necka EA, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;13(1):70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The displacement and stimulation hypotheses, developed for internet use, are applicable to social media use.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The displacement hypothesis posits that use of the internet for entertainment purposes displaces time spent socialising offline, subsequently undermining social connectedness.

    “Use of the internet for entertainment purposes – as a solitary, socially disengaged activity comparable to passive consumption of social media content without active engagement – is thought to displace time spent socialising with others offline, subsequently undermining social connectedness [11, 12].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukophadhyay T, Scherlis W. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol. 1998 Sep;53(9):1017–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] Bessière K, Kiesler S, Kraut R, Boneva BS. Effects of internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Community & Society. 2008 Feb 1;11(1):47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701858851. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The displacement and stimulation hypotheses, developed for internet use, are applicable to social media use.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Family connectedness buffers the negative effects of bullying and is related to lower risk for suicide-related outcomes and depressive symptoms.

    “Family connectedness in particular has been found to buffer the negative effects of bullying and to be related to lower risk for suicide-related outcomes and depressive symptoms [3, 4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] McLoughlin LT, Spears BA, Taddeo CM, Hermens DF. Remaining connected in the face of cyberbullying: why social connectedness is important for mental health. Psychol Sch. 2019;56(6):945–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22232. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Foster CE, Horwitz A, Thomas A, Opperman K, Gipson P, Burnside A, et al. Connectedness to family, school, peers, and community in socially vulnerable adolescents. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017 Oct 1;81:321–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.011. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The stimulation hypothesis posits that SMU enhances the user's existing social resources through increased contact and maintenance of relationships.

    “Evidence also exists in support of an opposing theory, the stimulation hypothesis, whereby SMU enhances the user’s existing social resources through increased contact and maintenance of relationships [17, 18].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [17] Nowland R, Necka EA, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;13(1):70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] Best P, Taylor B, Manktelow R. I’ve 500 friends, but who are my mates? Investigating the influence of online friend networks on adolescent wellbeing. Journal of Public Mental Health. 2015 . source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The displacement and stimulation hypotheses, developed for internet use, are applicable to social media use.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Flexibility in the topic guide allowed interview participants to take the conversation in any direction they felt relevant, mitigating the impact of adult researchers' preconceptions.

    “Flexibility in the topic guide allowed interview participants to take the conversation in any direction they felt to be relevant to the broad issue of social media and mental health, reflecting on their own SMU as well as that of their peers. This flexibility was felt to be important in mitigating the impact of the adult researchers’ preconceptions about adolescent SMU, social connectedness and”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Adolescents are increasingly using social media to enhance the quality of existing friendships rather than seeking out new connections, leading to beneficial impacts on social connectedness and social and emotional support.

    “In direct contradiction to the displacement hypothesis (whereby strong social ties are displaced with weak ones) it has been suggested that adolescents are increasingly using social media to enhance the quality of existing friendships rather than seeking out new connections, leading to beneficial impacts on social connectedness and social and emotional support [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Nowland R, Necka EA, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;13(1):70–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The displacement and stimulation hypotheses, developed for internet use, are applicable to social media use.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    A systematic and inclusive coding process was adopted, with coding applied flexibly to include unexpected data.

    “A systematic and inclusive coding process was adopted, with coding applied flexibly to include unexpected data [25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2020;14:1–25.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Peer popularity is a key aspect of identity development and sense of self in adolescence, and receipt of feedback to social media content may therefore still be an important contributor to well-being and peer connectedness for this age group.

    “However, peer popularity is a key aspect of identity development and sense of self in adolescence, and receipt of feedback to social media content may therefore still be an important contributor to well-being and peer connectedness for this age group [27].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Nesi J, Choukas-Bradley S, Prinstein MJ. Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: part 1—a theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018;21(3):267–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This aligns with neither the displacement nor stimulation hypothesis; participants seemed to reveal a sense of 'over-stimulation' or 'hyper-connectedness' with peers, whereby perceived excessive or duty-bound online communication no longer enhanced friendship quality but became a burden attached to friendships.

    “This aligns with neither the displacement nor stimulation hypothesis. These participants seemed to reveal a sense of ‘over-stimulation’ or ‘hyper-connectedness’ with peers, whereby perceived excessive or duty-bound online communication no longer enhanced friendship quality but became a burden attached to friendships.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Whereas passive or excessive SMU may be perceived to displace face-to-face interaction, using social media explicitly for socialising may fulfil more of a stimulation function - enabling friends to 'hang out' online when doing so in person is not possible.

    “Whereas passive or excessive SMU may be perceived to displace face-to-face interaction, using social media explicitly for socialising may fulfil more of a stimulation function – enabling friends to ‘hang out’ (M4, M5) online when doing so in person is not possible.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Analysis was conducted primarily by LW, who acknowledges that her own experiences of SMU will unavoidably frame her interpretation of the data.

    “Analysis was conducted primarily by LW, from the perspective of an adult using social media for direct communication with existing friends and family. LW acknowledges that her own experiences – both positive and negative – of SMU will unavoidably frame her interpretation of the data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Rather than a linear effect of displacement or stimulation, displacement or undermining of social connectedness seemed to present in a poor-get-poorer effect, whereas good quality relationships were further stimulated by SMU in a rich-get-richer effect.

    “Rather than a linear effect of displacement or stimulation, displacement or undermining of social connectedness seemed to present in a poor-get-poorer effect, whereas good quality relationships were further stimulated by SMU in a rich-get-richer effect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The understanding that provision of positive feedback is expected rather than based on genuine positive evaluation of content may undermine the validating effect of receiving positive feedback oneself, leading some young people to view likes or comments received on their own content as a superficial form of popularity and undermining benefits to self-esteem.

    “This understanding that provision of positive feedback is expected rather than based on genuine positive evaluation of content may undermine the validating effect of receiving positive feedback oneself, leading some young people to view likes or comments received on their own content as a superficial form of popularity and undermining benefits to self-esteem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants were not asked to provide feedback on the findings.

    “Participants were not asked to provide feedback on the findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    These more potentially hollow popularity-based aspects of friendships are indicative of 'weak' ties - a superficial type of peer support compared to the deeper benefits of strong affective ties defined by close emotional, tangible support, mutual respect and trust.

    “These more potentially hollow popularity-based aspects of friendships are indicative of ‘weak’ ties – a superficial type of peer support compared to the deeper benefits of strong affective ties defined by close emotional, tangible support, mutual respect and trust [11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Kraut R, Patterson M, Lundmark V, Kiesler S, Mukophadhyay T, Scherlis W. Internet paradox: a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am Psychol. 1998 Sep;53(9):1017–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    SMU was felt to strengthen or maintain peer connectedness for those with reduced opportunities for offline socialising, providing a protective effect from the risks of poor peer connectedness or loneliness.

    “SMU was thus felt to strengthen or maintain peer connectedness for those with reduced opportunities for offline socialising, providing a protective effect from the risks of poor peer connectedness or loneliness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    This emotive language seemed to convey a sense of excessive peer connectedness or over-stimulation emerging from unrealistic but increasingly normalised expectations of friendship.

    “This emotive language seemed to convey a sense of excessive peer connectedness or over-stimulation emerging from unrealistic but increasingly normalised expectations of friendship.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Initial themes were constructed and reviewed iteratively against each interview, with thematic boundaries altered as necessary and further amendments made following group discussion between authors.

    “Following coding of the complete dataset, initial themes were constructed and reviewed iteratively when examined against each interview, with thematic boundaries altered as necessary. Further amendments were made where appropriate following group discussion between the authors to review both codes and themes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Conversely, an existing lack of trust in relationships between young people and their parents may underpin a rejection of screen-time restrictions and a reluctance to report exposure to online harms, adding further to a sense of social distance and further undermining connectedness, consistent with a 'poor-get-poorer' effect.

    “Conversely, an existing lack of trust in relationships between young people and their parents may underpin a rejection of screen-time restrictions and a reluctance to report exposure to online harms, adding further to a sense of social distance and further undermining connectedness, consistent with a ‘poor-get-poorer’ effect (Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    An adult discourse of SMU displacing activities they perceived to be healthier had negative implications for highlighting differences between generational groups and reducing feelings of mutual respect and understanding.

    “Rather than displacement weakening family connectedness here, an adult discourse of SMU displacing activities they perceived to be healthier had negative implications for highlighting differences between generational groups and reducing feelings of mutual respect and understanding.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A cross-sectional survey of Canadian adolescents found that heavy SMU (3 or more hours per day) was associated with greater odds of negative reported relationships between mothers and daughters, fathers and daughters and fathers and sons, but not mothers and sons.

    “One of few studies examining SMU and family connectedness, a cross-sectional survey of Canadian adolescents [29] found that heavy SMU (3 or more hours per day) was associated with greater odds of negative reported relationships between mothers and daughters, fathers and daughters and fathers and sons, but not mothers and sons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Goldfield GS, Kingsbury M, Clayborne Z, Colman I. Social media use and parent–child relationship: a cross-sectional study of adolescents. J Community Psychology. 2020;48(3):793–803. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22293. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    Feeling understood and respected by adults should encourage young people to accept and appreciate healthy boundaries established regarding their digital activities.

    “Feeling understood and respected by adults should encourage young people to accept and appreciate healthy boundaries established regarding their digital activities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    A broad range of views and experiences were captured in the sample, which were sufficient to enable rich themes to be generated.

    “However, a broad range of views and experiences were captured in the sample, which were sufficient to enable rich themes to be generated [31].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health. 2021;13(2):201–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Different offline experiences and circumstances are likely to be accompanied by different online experiences, and caution should therefore be exercised in generalising findings from this study to other populations.

    “Different offline experiences and circumstances are likely to be accompanied by different online experiences, and caution should therefore be exercised in generalising findings from this study to other populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These age-related group differences - accentuated by divergent attitudes to SMU - have the potential to increase inter-generational discord, harming family connectedness through diminished feelings of mutual understanding and respect.

    “These age-related group differences – accentuated by divergent attitudes to SMU – have the potential to increase inter-generational discord, harming family connectedness through diminished feelings of mutual understanding and respect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In restricting online self-disclosure, this fear and mistrust of social media audiences represent a limit to online peer connectedness, aligned to the displacement of good quality face-to-face social interactions with less intimate ones online.

    “In restricting online self-disclosure, this fear and mistrust of social media audiences represent a limit to online peer connectedness, aligned to the displacement of good quality face-to-face social interactions with less intimate ones online.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With this supportive environment, young people are able to navigate online difficulties but also feel encouraged to share positive social media content with family members, promoting shared interests and family identity.

    “With this supportive environment, young people are able to navigate online difficulties but also feel encouraged to share positive social media content with family members, promoting shared interests and family identity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Previous research found that adolescents' time spent on instant messaging services enhances time spent face-to-face with friends, and subsequent quality of friendships.

    “This is in line with previous research finding that adolescents’ time spent on instant messaging services enhances time spent face-to-face with friends, and subsequent quality of friendships [20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Bohn A, Buchta C, Hornik K, Mair P. Making friends and communicating on Facebook: implications for the access to social capital. Soc Networks. 2014 May 1;37:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.11.003. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This supports a 'poor-get-poorer' or 'social deterioration' effect, whereby those who feel less connected to their family are likely to rely more on SMU for social interactions or to alleviate boredom at home, further compounding a lack of connectedness within the household.

    “This supports a ‘poor-get-poorer’ or ‘social deterioration’ effect, whereby those who feel less connected to their family are likely to rely more on SMU for social interactions or to alleviate boredom at home, further compounding a lack of connectedness within the household.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Combined with a general discomfort with online self-disclosure or fear of screenshotting among peers, this mistrust can simultaneously be perceived as a challenge to quality in peer relationships and interpreted as a constructive strategy for mitigating risk.

    “Combined with a general discomfort with online self-disclosure or fear of screenshotting among peers, this mistrust can simultaneously be perceived as a challenge to quality in peer relationships and interpreted as a constructive strategy for mitigating risk.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If, as our evidence suggests, the online social environment is an extension of relationships in the real world, fostering healthy connectedness with others offline is likely to maximise the social benefits and minimise the potential harms of social media for young people.

    “If, as our evidence suggests, the online social environment is an extension of relationships in the real world, fostering healthy connectedness with others offline is likely to maximise the social benefits and minimise the potential harms of social media for young people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This co-production could improve peer connectedness through collaboratively working to achieve a common creative goal and sharing in a sense of accomplishment.

    “This co-production could improve peer connectedness through collaboratively working to achieve a common creative goal and sharing in a sense of accomplishment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    Healthy peer relationships in which there is trust, respect, and space to ignore digital notifications and messages are likely to benefit most from SMU that enables enhanced self-disclosure and increased closeness without feeling oppressive.

    “Healthy peer relationships in which there is trust, respect, and space to ignore digital notifications and messages are likely to benefit most from SMU that enables enhanced self-disclosure and increased closeness without feeling oppressive.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Focusing on developing trusting, attentive relationships with peers and parents offline is likely to optimise the potential for social media to further benefit social connectedness.

    “Focusing on developing trusting, attentive relationships with peers and parents offline is likely to optimise the potential for social media to further benefit social connectedness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    While our sample was diverse in their experiences of social media, they were not selected on the basis of how much they used SMU or for what reasons, therefore it is possible that some additional patterns of SMU may exist in this age group that were not captured.

    “While our sample was diverse in their experiences of social media, they were not selected on the basis of how much they used SMU or for what reasons, therefore it is possible that some additional patterns of SMU may exist in this age group that were not captured.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Identity development and expression was supported by SMU, simultaneously stimulating connectedness to a wider peer network.

    “Identity development and expression was thus supported by SMU, simultaneously stimulating connectedness to a wider peer network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It may be that SMU for direct peer communication may stimulate connectedness and subsequent well-being to a point, whereas excessive communication and the associated expectations to respond might undermine these benefits.

    “It may be that SMU for direct peer communication may stimulate connectedness and subsequent well-being to a point, whereas excessive communication and the associated expectations to respond might undermine these benefits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Considering peer and family connectedness together, this is also illustrative of a 'poor-get-richer' or 'social compensation' effect, whereby poor family connectedness leads to increased online socialising with friends and subsequent improved peer connectedness.

    “Considering peer and family connectedness together, this is also illustrative of a ‘poor-get-richer’ or ‘social compensation’ effect, whereby poor family connectedness leads to increased online socialising with friends and subsequent improved peer connectedness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The fear of data misappropriation such as screenshotting within broader peer networks appeared to have led to widespread underlying feelings of mistrust, thus undermining peer connectedness, and lending weight to the suggestion that broader SMU may discourage development of 'strong ties'.

    “In addition, the fear of data misappropriation such as screenshotting within broader peer networks appeared to have led to widespread underlying feelings of mistrust, thus undermining peer connectedness, and lending weight to the suggestion that broader SMU may discourage development of ‘strong ties’.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Our sample size was somewhat smaller than planned due to the emergence of COVID-19, with boys in particular under-represented.

    “Our sample size was somewhat smaller than planned due to the emergence of COVID-19, with boys in particular under-represented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Where close friends were felt to be trustworthy, social media provided opportunities for self-disclosure, fostering intimacy in the relationship and improving peer connectedness in a 'rich-get-richer' or 'social enhancement' effect.

    “Where close friends were felt to be trustworthy, social media provided opportunities for self-disclosure, fostering intimacy in the relationship and improving peer connectedness in a ‘rich-get-richer’ or ‘social enhancement’ effect (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This aligns to the 'digital Goldilocks hypothesis' and other evidence of a curvilinear relationship between SMU and psychosocial adjustment, whereby moderate SMU is beneficial to well-being (compared to no use at all) but excessive use is associated with negative outcomes.

    “This aligns to the 'digital Goldilocks hypothesis' [24] and other evidence of a curvilinear relationship between SMU and psychosocial adjustment [23], whereby moderate SMU is beneficial to well-being (compared to no use at all) but excessive use is associated with negative outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] Przybylski AK, Orben A, Weinstein N. How much is too much? Examining the relationship between digital screen engagement and psychosocial functioning in a confirmatory cohort study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(9):1080–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.017. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] Wang K, Frison E, Eggermont S, Vandenbosch L. Active public Facebook use and adolescents' feelings of loneliness: evidence for a curvilinear relationship. J Adolesc. 2018;67:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.05.008. source

      Not checked in the free run.

76 of 76
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The displacement and stimulation hypotheses, developed for internet use, are applicable to social media use.

    “The displacement hypothesis was formulated on the basis of internet use rather than social media specifically [11].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The themes identified by the researchers reflect the participants’ experiences rather than solely the researchers’ interpretations.

    “We interpreted the data as adults who experienced adolescence in a time before social media existed and we reflected on this throughout the analytic process.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lonely young people's digital media engagement and its underpinning motivations cannot be summarized in simple terms; it likely represents a diverse spectrum of individual circumstances.

    “This indicates that lonely young people's digital media engagement, and the underpinning motivations for this engagement, cannot be summarized in simple terms; instead, it likely represents a diverse spectrum of individual circumstances. 48”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winstone, L., Mars, B., Haworth, C. M. A., & Kidger, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Winstone, Lizzy
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2021-09-24
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1736-1736
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199521301
Cited by
111
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PD‐SPH‐2015)
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Department of Health and Social Care (PD-SPH-2015)
  • School for Public Health Research (Grant Reference Number PD-SPH2015, PD‐SPH‐2015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social media use, social connectedness, adolescents, displacement theory, peer relationships, family connectedness, trust, identity, adolescent mental health, inner-city youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Loneliness, Mental Health, Peer Group, Social Environment, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review