Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Muscle and bone mass in middle-aged women: role of menopausal status and physical activity

Sipilä, Sarianna, Törmäkangas, Timo, Sillanpää, Elina, Aukee, Pauliina, Kujala, Urho M., Kovanen, Vuokko, Laakkonen, Eija K.·2020·Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

Abstract

Background: Women experience drastic hormonal changes during midlife due to the menopausal transition. Menopausal hormonal changes are known to lead to bone loss and potentially also to loss of lean mass. The loss of muscle and bone tissue coincide due to the functional relationship and interaction between these tissues. If and how physical activity counteracts deterioration in muscle and bone during the menopausal transition remains partly unresolved. This study investigated differences between premenopausal, early perimenopausal, late perimenopausal, and postmenopausal women in appendicular lean mass (ALM), appendicular lean mass index (ALMI), femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) and T score. Furthermore, we investigated the simultaneous associations of ALM and BMD with physical activity in the above‐mentioned menopausal groups. Methods: Data from the Estrogen Regulation of Muscle Apoptosis study were utilized. In total, 1393 women aged 47–55 years were assigned to premenopausal, early perimenopausal, late perimenopausal, and postmenopausal groups based on follicle‐stimulating hormone concentration and bleeding diaries. Of them, 897 were scanned for ALM and femoral neck BMD by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and ALMI (ALM/height 2 ) and neck T scores calculated. Current level of leisure‐time physical activity was estimated by a validated self‐report questionnaire and categorized as sedentary, low, medium, and high. Results: Appendicular lean mass, appendicular lean mass index, femoral neck bone mineral density, and and T score showed a significant linear declining trend across all four menopausal groups. Compared with the postmenopausal women, the premenopausal women showed greater ALM (18.2, SD 2.2 vs. 17.8, SD 2.1, P < 0.001), ALMI (6.73, SD 0.64 vs. 6.52, SD 0.62, P < 0.001), neck BMD (0.969, SD 0.117 vs. 0.925, SD 0.108, P < 0.001), and T score (−0.093, SD 0.977 vs −0.459, SD 0.902, P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounding pathways, a higher level of physical activity was associated with greater ALM among the premenopausal [ β = 0.171; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.063–0.280], late perimenopausal ( β = 0.289; CI 95% 0.174–0.403), and postmenopausal ( β =0.278; CI 95% 0.179–0.376) women. The positive association between femoral neck BMD and level of physical activity was significant only among the late perimenopausal women ( β = 0.227; CI 95% 0.097–0.356). Conclusions: Skeletal muscle and bone losses were associated with the menopausal transition. A higher level of physical activity during the different menopausal phases was beneficial, especially for skeletal muscle. Menopause‐related hormonal changes predispose women to sarcopenia and osteoporosis and further to mobility disability and fall‐related fractures in later life. New strategies are needed to promote physical activity among middle‐aged women. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcsm.12547

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1210/jc.2011-3362 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0378-5122(86)90038-1 · DOI
  3. 10.1210/jc.2012-1422 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0378-5122(94)00869-9 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00223-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.9.1473 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1210/jc.2005-1836 · DOI
  8. 10.1172/jci.insight.124865 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/ijo.2010.33 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.010 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/jbmr.192 · DOI
  12. 10.3390/nu10081103 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000230 · DOI
  14. Maurel DB, 2017, Muscle‐bone crosstalk: emerging opportunities for novel therapeutic approaches to treat musculoskeletal pathologies, Biomedicine, 5
  15. 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.2183 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00794-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/jor.1100050217 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/s00421-011-1849-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s00223-012-9618-1 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.03.016 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/jcsm.12386 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/GME.0000000000001117 · DOI
  24. 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1108 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1007/s00198-013-2413-7 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/sms.12782 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/ntr/ntz081 · DOI
  28. 10.1097/GME.0000000000000951 · DOI
  29. 10.3389/fendo.2011.00077 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.09.058 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00701.x · DOI
  32. 10.3113/FAI.2010.1081 · DOI
  33. 10.1097/GME.0000000000001137 · DOI
  34. 10.1210/jc.2012-3651 · DOI
  35. 10.1210/en.2018-00601 · DOI
  36. 10.1196/annals.1402.056 · DOI
  37. 10.1056/NEJM199712043372301 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1210/jc.2019-00192 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.4158/EP161435.GL · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1097/MD.0000000000014898 · DOI
  41. 10.1371/journal.pone.0195463 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052704 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.2165/11597670-000000000-00000 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.2165/00007256-200636080-00005 · DOI
  46. 10.1007/s00198-009-1101-0 · DOI
  47. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00473.2015 · DOI
  49. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001598 · DOI
  50. 10.1359/jbmr.071205 · DOI
  51. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00200.2003 · DOI
  52. 10.1359/jbmr.081008 · DOI
  53. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011843 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/ije/dyw007 · DOI
  55. Kontio T, 2019, To what extent do education and physical work load factors explain occupational differences in disability retirement due to knee OA? A nationwide register‐based study in Finland, BMJ Open, 8, e023057, 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023057 · DOI
  56. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/jcsm.12501 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Sipilä, S., Törmäkangas, T., Sillanpää, E., Aukee, P., Kujala, U. M., Kovanen, V., & Laakkonen, E. K.
Affiliations
  • Gerontology Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pelvic Floor Research and Therapy Unit Central Finland Central Hospital Jyväskylä Finland
  • Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland
Venue
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
698-709
ISSN
  • 2190-5991
  • 2190-6009
Cited by
228
References
15
Language
en
Funders
  • Sarianna Sipilä (15-0667)
  • Eija Laakkonen (309504)
  • Vuokko Kovanen (275323)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Muscle and bone mass in middle-aged women: role of menopausal status and physical activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcsm.12547
The paper
Sipilä, S., Törmäkangas, T., Sillanpää, E., Aukee, P., Kujala, U. M., Kovanen, V., & Laakkonen, E. K. (2020). Muscle and bone mass in middle-aged women: role of menopausal status and physical activity. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12547

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.