The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Muscle and bone mass in middle-aged women: role of menopausal status and physical activity
Abstract
Background: Women experience drastic hormonal changes during midlife due to the menopausal transition. Menopausal hormonal changes are known to lead to bone loss and potentially also to loss of lean mass. The loss of muscle and bone tissue coincide due to the functional relationship and interaction between these tissues. If and how physical activity counteracts deterioration in muscle and bone during the menopausal transition remains partly unresolved. This study investigated differences between premenopausal, early perimenopausal, late perimenopausal, and postmenopausal women in appendicular lean mass (ALM), appendicular lean mass index (ALMI), femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) and T score. Furthermore, we investigated the simultaneous associations of ALM and BMD with physical activity in the above‐mentioned menopausal groups. Methods: Data from the Estrogen Regulation of Muscle Apoptosis study were utilized. In total, 1393 women aged 47–55 years were assigned to premenopausal, early perimenopausal, late perimenopausal, and postmenopausal groups based on follicle‐stimulating hormone concentration and bleeding diaries. Of them, 897 were scanned for ALM and femoral neck BMD by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and ALMI (ALM/height 2 ) and neck T scores calculated. Current level of leisure‐time physical activity was estimated by a validated self‐report questionnaire and categorized as sedentary, low, medium, and high. Results: Appendicular lean mass, appendicular lean mass index, femoral neck bone mineral density, and and T score showed a significant linear declining trend across all four menopausal groups. Compared with the postmenopausal women, the premenopausal women showed greater ALM (18.2, SD 2.2 vs. 17.8, SD 2.1, P < 0.001), ALMI (6.73, SD 0.64 vs. 6.52, SD 0.62, P < 0.001), neck BMD (0.969, SD 0.117 vs. 0.925, SD 0.108, P < 0.001), and T score (−0.093, SD 0.977 vs −0.459, SD 0.902, P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounding pathways, a higher level of physical activity was associated with greater ALM among the premenopausal [ β = 0.171; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.063–0.280], late perimenopausal ( β = 0.289; CI 95% 0.174–0.403), and postmenopausal ( β =0.278; CI 95% 0.179–0.376) women. The positive association between femoral neck BMD and level of physical activity was significant only among the late perimenopausal women ( β = 0.227; CI 95% 0.097–0.356). Conclusions: Skeletal muscle and bone losses were associated with the menopausal transition. A higher level of physical activity during the different menopausal phases was beneficial, especially for skeletal muscle. Menopause‐related hormonal changes predispose women to sarcopenia and osteoporosis and further to mobility disability and fall‐related fractures in later life. New strategies are needed to promote physical activity among middle‐aged women. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Physical activity combats the musculoskeletal changes associated with menopause [9], reduces the risk of chronic disease [10], and improves quality of life in menopausal females [8].”
From Frequency and perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on training and performance in female endurance athletes (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“Because of the positive benefits of physical activity in improving cardiovascular health [52], musculoskeletal health [9], and quality of life [8] in menopausal females”
From Frequency and perceived influence of menopausal symptoms on training and performance in female endurance athletes (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis
Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Baeyens, J. P., Bauer, J. M., Boirie, Y., Cederholm, T., Landi, F., Martin, F. C., Michel, J.-P., Rolland, Y., Schneider, S. M., et al. (2010) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afq034 · Cited by 11,601
Epidemiology of Sarcopenia among the Elderly in New Mexico
Baumgartner, R. N., Koehler, K. M., Gallagher, D., Romero, L., Heymsfield, S. B., Ross, R. R., Garry, P. J., & Lindeman, R. D. (1998) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009520 · Cited by 4,004
Goodpaster, B. H., Park, S. W., Harris, T. B., Kritchevsky, S. B., Nevitt, M., Schwartz, A. V., Simonsick, E. M., Tylavsky, F. A., Visser, M., Newman, A. B., et al. (2006) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/61.10.1059 · Cited by 3,083
Studenski, S. A., Peters, K. W., Alley, D. E., Cawthon, P. M., McLean, R. R., Harris, T. B., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J. M., Fragala, M. S., Kenny, A. M., et al. (2014) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glu010 · Cited by 2,545
Sex Steroids and the Construction and Conservation of the Adult Skeleton
Riggs, B. L., Khosla, S., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.23.3.0465 · Cited by 1,846
Pathogenesis of osteoporosis: concepts, conflicts, and prospects
Raisz, L. G. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci27071 · Cited by 1,779
Dynapenia and aging: an update
Manini, T. M., & Clark, B. C. (2012) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glr010 · Cited by 875
Schoenaker, D. A., Jackson, C. A., Rowlands, J. V., & Mishra, G. D. (2014) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyu094 · Cited by 550
A meta-analysis of the effects of cigarette smoking on bone mineral density
Ward, K. D., & Klesges, R. C. (2001) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02390832 · Cited by 530
SIPILÄ, S., TAAFFE, D. R., CHENG, S., PUOLAKKA, J., TOIVANEN, J., & SUOMINEN, H. (2001) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs1010147 · Cited by 230
Self-citationAging of the musculoskeletal system: How the loss of estrogen impacts muscle strength
Collins, B. C., Laakkonen, E. K., & Lowe, D. A. (2019) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2019.03.033 · Cited by 227
Self-citationTHE METABOLIC EFFECTS OF STEROID HORMONES IN OSTEOPOROSIS
Reifenstein, E. C., & Albright, F. (1947) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci101787 · Cited by 217
The Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Bone Mass: An Overview of Pathophysiologic Mechanisms
Al-Bashaireh, A. M., Haddad, L. G., Weaver, M., Chengguo, X., Kelly, D. L., & Yoon, S. (2018) · Journal of Osteoporosis · doi:10.1155/2018/1206235 · Cited by 209 · cited 1×
“001 Never 90 (39) 94 (53) 110 (57) 160 (56) Former 36 (15) 27 (15) 28 (15) 54 (19) Current 108 (46) 58 (32) 54 (28) 74 (26) Musculoskeletal problem, n (%) 78 (33) 63 (35) 77 (40) 99 (34) 0.”
Expression of Both Oestrogen Receptor Alpha and Beta in Human Skeletal Muscle Tissue
Wiik, A., Ekman, M., Johansson, O., Jansson, E., & Esbjörnsson, M. (2009) · Histochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1007/s00418-008-0512-x · Cited by 190
Ronkainen, P. H. A., Kovanen, V., Alén, M., Pöllänen, E., Palonen, E.-M., Ankarberg-Lindgren, C., Hämäläinen, E., Turpeinen, U., Kujala, U. M., Puolakka, J., et al. (2009) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91518.2008 · Cited by 168
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- 10.1210/jc.2011-3362 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0378-5122(86)90038-1 · DOI
- 10.1210/jc.2012-1422 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-5122(94)00869-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00223-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.9.1473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1210/jc.2005-1836 · DOI
- 10.1172/jci.insight.124865 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ijo.2010.33 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jbmr.192 · DOI
- 10.3390/nu10081103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000230 · DOI
- Maurel DB, 2017, Muscle‐bone crosstalk: emerging opportunities for novel therapeutic approaches to treat musculoskeletal pathologies, Biomedicine, 5
- 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.2183 · DOI
- 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00794-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/jor.1100050217 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00421-011-1849-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00223-012-9618-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.03.016 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jcsm.12386 · DOI
- 10.1097/GME.0000000000001117 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00198-013-2413-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/sms.12782 · DOI
- 10.1093/ntr/ntz081 · DOI
- 10.1097/GME.0000000000000951 · DOI
- 10.3389/fendo.2011.00077 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.09.058 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00701.x · DOI
- 10.3113/FAI.2010.1081 · DOI
- 10.1097/GME.0000000000001137 · DOI
- 10.1210/jc.2012-3651 · DOI
- 10.1210/en.2018-00601 · DOI
- 10.1196/annals.1402.056 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199712043372301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1210/jc.2019-00192 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4158/EP161435.GL · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/MD.0000000000014898 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0195463 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bone.2008.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052704 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2165/11597670-000000000-00000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2165/00007256-200636080-00005 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00198-009-1101-0 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00473.2015 · DOI
- 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001598 · DOI
- 10.1359/jbmr.071205 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00200.2003 · DOI
- 10.1359/jbmr.081008 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011843 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyw007 · DOI
- Kontio T, 2019, To what extent do education and physical work load factors explain occupational differences in disability retirement due to knee OA? A nationwide register‐based study in Finland, BMJ Open, 8, e023057, 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023057 · DOI
- 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000870 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcsm.12501 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Elliott-Sale, K. J., Minahan, C. L., de Jonge, X. A. K. J., Ackerman, K. E., Sipilä, S., Constantini, N. W., Lebrun, C. M., & Hackney, A. C. (2021) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01435-8 · Cited by 731
Self-citationBurke, L. M., Ackerman, K. E., Heikura, I. A., Hackney, A. C., & Stellingwerff, T. (2023) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-107335 · Cited by 59
Domaszewski, P., Konieczny, M., Pakosz, P., Łukaniszyn-Domaszewska, K., Mikuláková, W., Sadowska-Krępa, E., & Anton, S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13904-9 · Cited by 42
Bays, H. E., Golden, A., & Tondt, J. (2022) · Obesity Pillars · doi:10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100034 · Cited by 34
Yao, K., Su, H., Cui, K., Gao, Y., Xu, D., Wang, Q., Ha, Z., Zhang, T., Chen, S., & Liu, T. (2024) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100165 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Sipilä, S., Törmäkangas, T., Sillanpää, E., Aukee, P., Kujala, U. M., Kovanen, V., & Laakkonen, E. K.
- Affiliations
- Gerontology Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pelvic Floor Research and Therapy Unit Central Finland Central Hospital Jyväskylä Finland
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 698-709
- ISSN
- 2190-5991
- 2190-6009
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 15
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Sarianna Sipilä (15-0667)
- Eija Laakkonen (309504)
- Vuokko Kovanen (275323)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.