Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insights into the mechanism of magnetofection using PEI‐based magnetofectins for gene transfer

Open access
Huth, Stephanie, Lausier, James, Gersting, Soeren W., Rudolph, Carsten, Plank, Christian, Welsch, Ulrich, Rosenecker, Joseph·2004·The Journal of Gene Medicine

Abstract

Background: Gene delivery by the use of magnetic forces, so‐called magnetofection, has been shown to enhance transfection efficiency of viral and non‐viral systems up to several‐hundred‐fold. For this purpose gene carriers, such as polyethylenimine (PEI), are associated with superparamagnetic nanoparticles and complexed with plasmid DNA. Gene delivery is targeted by the application of a magnetic field. Methods: To investigate the underlying mechanism, we studied the impact of the applied magnetic field on the transfection process of PEI‐coated superparamagnetic iron oxide gene vectors (magnetofectins) using various cell lines. In particular, we addressed the question whether accelerated sedimentation of magnetofectins is the driving force or if the magnetic field itself directly influences the endocytic processing of the magnetofectins. The cellular uptake mechanism of magnetofectins was studied by electron microscopy and transfection experiments in the presence of various inhibitors that operate at different steps of endocytosis. Results: In this study we could show that cellular uptake of magnetofectins proceeds obviously by endocytosis. Cellular uptake of magnetofectins behaves almost analogously as compared with PEI polyplexes. Besides unspecific endocytosis, apparently clathrin‐dependent as well as caveolae‐mediated endocytic uptake is involved. Conclusions: The magnetic field itself does not alter the uptake mechanism of magnetofectins. Obviously, the magnetic forces lead to an accelerated sedimentation of magnetofectins on the cell surface and do not directly affect the endocytic uptake mechanism. So further improvement of magnetic field application could lead to efficient targeting of gene expression into the desired organ and tissue in vivo. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jgm.577

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Huth, S., Lausier, J., Gersting, S. W., Rudolph, C., Plank, C., Welsch, U., & Rosenecker, J.
Venue
The Journal of Gene Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-30
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
923-936
ISSN
  • 1099-498X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-2254
OpenAlex
W2045978018
Cited by
280
References
29
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insights into the mechanism of magnetofection using PEI‐based magnetofectins for gene transfer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jgm.577
The paper
Huth, S., Lausier, J., Gersting, S. W., Rudolph, C., Plank, C., Welsch, U., & Rosenecker, J. (2004). Insights into the mechanism of magnetofection using PEI‐based magnetofectins for gene transfer. The Journal of Gene Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.577

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.