Cited by 321Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Challenges and limitations of quantifying brain connectivity in vivo with diffusion MRI

Jones, Derek K·2010·Imaging in Medicine

Abstract

This article addresses whether or not diffusion MRI, a noninvasive technique that probes the microstructural aspects of tissue, can be used to quantify the white matter connectivity of the human brain in vivo. It begins by studying the motivation, that is, the increasing trend to look at ‘functional connectivity’ in the brain, which implies that the brain operates as a distributed network of active locations. A brief summary of diffusion MRI and fiber tracking is given and the early applications of diffusion MRI to study connectivity are reviewed. A close and critical inspection is then made of the limitations inherent in these different approaches, challenging the notion that it is possible to quantify brain connectivity in vivo with diffusion MRI. Finally, steps toward improving quantification of connectivity, by integrating information from other techniques, are suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/iim.10.21

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These problems have been discussed in schematic representations or theoretical arguments but have not yet been quantified in brain imaging.

    “Since the invention of diffusion tractography, these problems have been discussed in schematic representations or theoretical arguments7, 8, 37, but have not yet been quantified in brain imaging.”
  • Some underlying ambiguities in tractography have been discussed using schematic representations and theoretical arguments.

    “some of the underlying ambiguities in tractography have been discussed using schematic representations and theoretical arguments1, 7, 8, 37.”
  • Raw streamline count is not a quantitative measure of connection density.

    “This limitation is often expressed as the mantra “streamline count is not quantitative.””
  • The first category of quantitative measures is based on tractography data alone and is often used to define connectivity strength.

    “The first category of quantitative measures are based on the tractography data alone, which are often used to define the connectivity strength (Jones, 2010; Smith et al., 2020a; Sotiropoulos and Zalesky, 2019; Yeh et al., 2020).”
  • NOS does not provide a truly quantitative measure of connection strength because of the difference in resolution between the measured dMRI signal and actual axon dimensions.

    “However, because of the difference in resolution between the measured dMRI signal and actual axon dimensions (as described in Section 3.3: “Connection density biases”), many studies have emphasized that NOS does not provide a truly quantitative measure of connection strength (Jones, 2010; Jones et al., 2013; Sotiropoulos and Zalesky, 2019; Yeh et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, D. K.
Corresponding author
Jones, Derek K
Venue
Imaging in Medicine
Published
2010-06
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
341-355
ISSN
  • 1755-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-5205
OpenAlex
W2152552783
Cited by
321
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
17.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Imaging in Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
diffusion MRI, brain connectivity, white matter connectivity, functional connectivity, tractography, human brain networks, multimodal integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review