The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications
Abstract
Many studies have investigated the use of magnetic resonance relaxation times for tissue characterization. A number have been performed in vivo with clinical whole‐body imagers. Unfortunately, the results have yet to establish the role of quantitative tissue relaxation time measurements in clinical diagnosis. One of the major problems is that the techniques used in many of these studies are error prone, making the results inconclusive. In the present study, the problems associated with clinical T2 measurements were systematically evaluated in an attempt to obtain reliable in vivo quantitation. The authors demonstrate that spoiler gradients are the most effective technique for artifact suppression but that they render ineffective radio‐frequency phase schemes such as the Meiboom‐Gill modification to the Carr‐Purcell sequence to compensate experimental imperfections. The present study results in a more reliable multiecho sequence for T2 measurement. Preliminary clinical results in brain and cervix demonstrate the performance of the new technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting
Ma, D., Gulani, V., Seiberlich, N., Liu, K., Sunshine, J. L., Duerk, J. L., & Griswold, M. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11971 · Cited by 1,577
In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance
Mackay, A., Whittall, K., Adler, J., Li, D., Paty, D., & Graeb, D. (1994) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910310614 · Cited by 914
Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer exchange and relaxation properties in vivo using MRI
Sled, J. G., & Pike, G. B. (2001) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1278 · Cited by 419
Insights into brain microstructure from the T2 distribution
MacKay, A., Laule, C., Vavasour, I., Bjarnason, T., Kolind, S., & Mädler, B. (2006) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2005.12.037 · Cited by 347
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myelin
Laule, C., Vavasour, I. M., Kolind, S. H., Li, D. K. B., Traboulsee, T. L., Moore, G. R. W., & MacKay, A. L. (2007) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.004 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Poon, C. S., & Henkelman, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 541-553
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W2172129753
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.1880020512
- The paper
- Poon, C. S., & Henkelman, R. M. (1992). Practical T2 quantitation for clinical applications. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880020512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.