The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extended phase graphs: Dephasing, RF pulses, and echoes ‐ pure and simple
Abstract
The extended phase graph (EPG) concept represents a powerful tool for depicting and understanding the magnetization response of a broad variety of MR sequences. EPGs focus on echo generation as well as on classification and use a Fourier based magnetization description in terms of “configurations states”. The effect of gradients, radiofrequency (RF) pulses, relaxation, and motion phenomena during the MR sequence is characterized as the action of a few matrix operations on these configuration states. Thus, the EPG method allows for fast and precise quantitation of echo intensities even if several gradients and RF pulses are applied. EPG diagrams aid in the comprehension of different types of echoes and their corresponding echo time. Despite its several benefits in regard to a large number of problems and issues, researchers and users still often refrain from applying EPGs. It seems that “phase graphing” is still seen as a kind of “magic.” The present review investigates the foundation of EPGs and sheds light on prerequisites for adding more advanced phenomena such as diffusion. The links between diagrams and calculations are discussed. A further focus is on limitations and simplifications as well recent extensions within the EPG concept. To make the review complete, representative software for EPG coding is provided. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;41:266–295.© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications
Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J., Poupon, C., Clark, C. A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., & Chabriat, H. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1076 · Cited by 3,547
Cited by
Jiang, Y., Ma, D., Seiberlich, N., Gulani, V., & Griswold, M. A. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.25559 · Cited by 422
Carlier, P. G., Marty, B., Scheidegger, O., Loureiro de Sousa, P., Baudin, P.-Y., Snezhko, E., & Vlodavets, D. (2016) · Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases · doi:10.3233/jnd-160145 · Cited by 186
Effects of formalin fixation and temperature on MR relaxation times in the human brain
Birkl, C., Langkammer, C., Golob‐Schwarzl, N., Leoni, M., Haybaeck, J., Goessler, W., Fazekas, F., & Ropele, S. (2016) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.3477 · Cited by 111
Teixeira, R. P. A. G., Malik, S. J., & Hajnal, J. V. (2018) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.26670 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Weigel, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04-16
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 266-295
- ISSN
- 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2586
- OpenAlex
- W1963427860
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extended phase graphs: Dephasing, RF pulses, and echoes ‐ pure and simple. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.24619
- The paper
- Weigel, M. (2015). Extended phase graphs: Dephasing, RF pulses, and echoes ‐ pure and simple. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.