Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice

Open access
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B., Padhani, Anwar R., Chenevert, Thomas L., Koh, Dow‐Mu, De Keyzer, Frederik, Taouli, Bachir, Le Bihan, Denis·2015·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Technologic advances enable performance of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) at ultrahigh b‐values, where standard monoexponential model analysis may not apply. Rather, non‐Gaussian water diffusion properties emerge, which in cellular tissues are, in part, influenced by the intracellular environment that is not well evaluated by conventional DWI. The novel technique, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), enables characterization of non‐Gaussian water diffusion behavior. More advanced mathematical curve fitting of the signal intensity decay curve using the DKI model provides an additional parameter K app that presumably reflects heterogeneity and irregularity of cellular microstructure, as well as the amount of interfaces within cellular tissues. Although largely applied for neural applications over the past decade, a small number of studies have recently explored DKI outside the brain. The most investigated organ is the prostate, with preliminary studies suggesting improved tumor detection and grading using DKI. Although still largely in the research phase, DKI is being explored in wider clinical settings. When assessing extracranial applications of DKI, careful attention to details with which body radiologists may currently be unfamiliar is important to ensure reliable results. Accordingly, a robust understanding of DKI is necessary for radiologists to better understand the meaning of DKI‐derived metrics in the context of different tumors and how these metrics vary between tumor types and in response to treatment. In this review, we outline DKI principles, propose biostructural basis for observations, provide a comparison with standard monoexponential fitting and the apparent diffusion coefficient, report on extracranial clinical investigations to date, and recommend technical considerations for implementation in body imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:1190–1202.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.24985

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Rosenkrantz, A. B., Padhani, A. R., Chenevert, T. L., Koh, D., De Keyzer, F., Taouli, B., & Le Bihan, D.
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
1190-1202
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W1954524748
Cited by
381
References
54
FWCI
21.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jmri.24985
The paper
Rosenkrantz, A. B., Padhani, A. R., Chenevert, T. L., Koh, D., De Keyzer, F., Taouli, B., & Le Bihan, D. (2015). Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.