Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resting-state power and regional connectivity after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury

Stephenson, David D., Meier, Timothy B., Pabbathi Reddy, Sharvani, Robertson‐Benta, Cidney R., Hergert, Danielle C., Dodd, Andrew B., Shaff, Nicholas A., Ling, Josef M., Oglesbee, Scott J., Campbell, Richard A., Phillips, John P., Sapien, Robert E., Mayer, Andrew R.·2020·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Background: Physiological recovery from pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI) as a function of age remains actively debated, with the majority of studies relying on subjective symptom report rather than objective markers of brain physiology. Purpose: To examine potential abnormalities in fractional amplitude of low‐frequency fluctuations (fALFF) or regional homogeniety (ReHo) during resting‐state fMRI following pmTBI. Study Type: Prospective cohort. Population: Consecutively recruited pmTBI (N = 105; 8–18 years old) and age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (HC; N = 113). Field Strength/Sequence: 3T multiecho gradient T 1‐weighted and single‐shot gradient‐echo echo‐planar imaging. Assessment: All pmTBI participants were assessed 1 week and 4 months postinjury (HC assessed at equivalent timepoints after the first visit). Comprehensive demographic, clinical, and cognitive batteries were performed in addition to primary investigation of fALFF and ReHo. All pmTBI were classified as “persistent” or “recovered” based on both assessment periods. Statistical Tests: Chi‐square, nonparametric, and generalized linear models for demographic data. Generalized estimating equations for clinical and cognitive data. Voxelwise general linear models (AFNI's 3dMVM) for fALFF and ReHo assessment. Results: Evidence of recovery was observed for some, but not all, clinical and cognitive measures at 4 months postinjury. fALFF was increased in the left striatum for pmTBI relative to HC both at 1 week and 4 months postinjury; whereas no significant group differences (P > 0.001) were observed for ReHo. Age‐at‐injury did not moderate either resting‐state metric across groups. In contrast to analyses of pmTBI as a whole, there were no significant (P > 0.001) differences in either fALFF or ReHo in patients with persistent postconcussive symptoms compared to recovered patients and controls at 4 months postinjury. Data Conclusions: Our findings suggest prolonged clinical recovery and alterations in the relative amplitude of resting‐state fluctuations up to 4 months postinjury, but no clear relationship with age‐at‐injury or subjective symptom report. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2020;52:1701–1713.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.27249

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1001/jama.2014.3979 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.04.011 · DOI
  3. 10.1089/neu.2019.6805 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2374 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1089/neu.2018.5739 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/acn3.764 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11682-016-9520-y · DOI
  8. 10.1089/brain.2014.0279 · DOI
  9. 10.1089/neu.2013.3269 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000368 · DOI
  12. 10.1089/neu.2019.6471 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.002 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/01.HTR.0000327255.38881.ca · DOI
  15. 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-691 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/sleep/33.6.781 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/1073191111411667 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.12.006 · DOI
  22. Derogatis LR Fitzpatrick M.The SCL‐90‐R the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the BSI‐18. InM. E.Maruish(Ed.) The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults; 1–41.New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers;2004.
  23. 10.1089/neu.2011.2272 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Delis DC, 2001, Delis‐Kaplan executive function system (D‐KEFS)
  25. Wechsler D, 2008, Wechsler adult intelligence scale‐fourth
  26. Wechsler D, 2014, Wechsler intelligence scale for children‐fifth edition (WISC‐V): Technical and interpretive manual
  27. Wilkinson GS, 2006, WRAT 4: Wide range achievement test; professional manual, Lutz, FL: Psychology Assessment Resources
  28. 10.1093/arclin/acs044 · DOI
  29. 10.1089/brain.2013.0154 · DOI
  30. 10.1089/brain.2016.0475 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1002/hbm.22563 · DOI
  32. 10.1089/neu.2019.6471 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/02699052.2017.1406990 · DOI
  34. 10.1037/a0018112 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1089/neu.2017.5185 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/0271678X19896883 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000186950.54075.3B · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.059 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1002/jmri.24310 · DOI
  41. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00027 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/hbm.23286 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/s11910-018-0881-z · DOI
  44. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17020235 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/brain/awr103 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.10.001 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/hbm.23526 · DOI
  48. 10.1073/pnas.1720985115 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/dev.20199 · DOI
  50. 10.1089/brain.2013.0195 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stephenson, D. D., Meier, T. B., Pabbathi Reddy, S., Robertson‐Benta, C. R., Hergert, D. C., Dodd, A. B., Shaff, N. A., Ling, J. M., Oglesbee, S. J., Campbell, R. A., Phillips, J. P., Sapien, R. E., & Mayer, A. R.
Affiliations
  • The Mind Research Network/LBERI Albuquerque New Mexico USA
  • Department of Neurosurgery Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
  • Emergency Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA
  • Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-27
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
1701-1713
ISSN
  • 1053-1807
  • 1522-2586
Cited by
26
References
7
Language
en
Funders
National Institutes of Health (NIH 01 R01 NS098494‐01A1, NIH 01 R01 NS098494‐03S1A1, NS098494‐01A1, NIH 01 R01)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.