The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimizing UV laser focus profiles for improved MALDI performance
Open accessAbstract
Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) applications, such as proteomics, genomics, clinical profiling and MALDI imaging, have created a growing demand for faster instrumentation. Since the commonly used nitrogen lasers have throughput and life span limitations, diode‐pumped solid‐state lasers are an alternative. Unfortunately this type of laser shows clear performance limitations in MALDI in terms of sensitivity, resolution and ease of use, for applications such as thin‐layer sample preparations, acceptance of various matrices (e.g. DHB for glycopeptides) and MALDI imaging. While it is obvious that the MALDI process has some dependence on the characteristics of the laser used, it is unclear which features are the most critical in determining laser performance for MALDI. In this paper we show, for the first time, that a spatially structured laser beam profile in lieu of a Gaussian profile is of striking importance. This result enabled us to design diode‐pumped Nd : YAG lasers that on various critical applications perform as well for MALDI as the nitrogen lasers and in some respects even better. The modulation of the beam profile appears to be a new parameter for optimizing the MALDI process. In addition, the results trigger new questions directing us to a better understanding of the MALDI process. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples: Localization of Peptides and Proteins Using MALDI-TOF MS
Caprioli, R. M., Farmer, T. B., & Gile, J. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac970888i · Cited by 2,234
Cited by
Norris, J. L., & Caprioli, R. M. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3004295 · Cited by 696
Groseclose, M. R., Andersson, M., Hardesty, W. M., & Caprioli, R. M. (2007) · Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/jms.1177 · Cited by 377
Recent developments in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and related techniques
Holčapek, M., Jirásko, R., & Lísa, M. (2012) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2012.08.072 · Cited by 330
Lipid imaging with time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS)
Passarelli, M. K., & Winograd, N. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.05.007 · Cited by 314
Proteomic analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by MALDI imaging mass spectrometry
Casadonte, R., & Caprioli, R. M. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.388 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Holle, A., Haase, A., Kayser, M., & Höhndorf, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-22
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 705-716
- ISSN
- 1076-5174 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9888
- OpenAlex
- W2064982623
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.