The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liquid chromatographic/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric study of the phenolic composition of cocoa (Theobroma cacao)
Abstract
Liquid chromatography coupled with ionspray mass spectrometry in the tandem mode (LC/MS/MS) with negative ion detection was used for the identification of a variety of phenolic compounds in a cocoa sample. Gradient elution with water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% HCOOH, was used. Standard solutions of 31 phenolic compounds, including benzoic and cinnamic acids and flavonoid compounds, were studied in the negative ion mode using MS/MS product ion scans. At low collisional activation, the deprotonated molecule [M − H]− was observed for all the compounds studied. For cinnamic and benzoic acids, losses of CO 2 or formation of [M − CH 3]−· in the case of methoxylated compounds were observed. However, for flavonol and flavone glycosides, the spectra present both the deprotonated molecule [M − H]− of the glycoside and the ion corresponding to the deprotonated aglycone [A − H]−. The latter ion is formed by loss of the rhamnose, glucose, galactose or arabinose residue from the glycosides. Different fragmentation patterns were observed in MS/MS experiments for flavone‐C‐glycosides which showed fragmentation in the sugar part. Fragmentation of aglycones provided characteristic ions for each family of flavonoids. The optimum LC/MS/MS conditions were applied to the characterization of a cocoa sample that had been subjected to an extraction/clean‐up procedure which involved chromatography on Sephadex LH20 and thin‐layer chromatographic monitoring. In addition to compounds described in the literature, such as epicatechin and catechin, quercetin, isoquercitrin (quercetin‐3‐O‐glucoside) and quercetin‐3‐O‐arabinose, other compounds were identified for the first time in cocoa samples, such as hyperoside (quercetin‐3‐O‐galactoside), naringenin, luteolin, apigenin and some O‐glucosides and C‐glucosides of these compounds. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hammerstone, J. F., Lazarus, S. A., Mitchell, A. E., Rucker, R., & Schmitz, H. H. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf980760h · Cited by 455
Cited by
Shahidi, F., & Ambigaipalan, P. (2015) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 · Cited by 3,081
Distribution and biological activities of the flavonoid luteolin
Lopez-Lazaro, M. (2009) · Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/138955709787001712 · Cited by 1,106
Lai, J.-P., Lim, Y. H., Su, J., Shen, H.-M., & Ong, C. N. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.028 · Cited by 189
Kallel, F., Driss, D., Chaari, F., Belghith, L., Bouaziz, F., Ghorbel, R., & Chaabouni, S. E. (2014) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.07.047 · Cited by 181
Pacifico, S., Galasso, S., Piccolella, S., Kretschmer, N., Pan, S.-P., Marciano, S., Bauer, R., & Monaco, P. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2014.12.019 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Sánchez‐Rabaneda, F., Jáuregui, O., Casals, I., Andrés‐Lacueva, C., Izquierdo‐Pulido, M., & Lamuela‐Raventós, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-42
- ISSN
- 1076-5174 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9888
- OpenAlex
- W2036081797
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.